Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.

Colorado judicial elections, 2012

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Judicial elections
2013
2011
Judicial Elections
Ballotpedia Election Coverage Badge.png
Judicial elections, 2012
Judicial election dates


The Colorado judicial elections consisted of the general election in November 2012.


Colorado judicial elections summary, 2012

  Supreme Appellate Trial
Total candidates 1 6 83
Unopposed candidates 0
Judges facing retention 1 6 83
Judges retained 1 6 83
Judges re-elected
Judges not re-elected
New judges elected
Partisan or Nonpartisan   Retention  


Supreme Court

CandidateIncumbentRetention vote:Retention Vote %
CoatsNathan Coats   ApprovedAYes1,399,32671.39%ApprovedA

Court of Appeals

CandidateIncumbentRetention vote:Retention Vote %
TaubmanDaniel Taubman   ApprovedAYes1,357,45271.42%ApprovedA
GrahamDennis Graham   ApprovedAYes1,336,26169.89%ApprovedA
MillerGale Miller   ApprovedAYes1,350,97770.88%ApprovedA
CaseboltJames Casebolt   ApprovedAYes1,391,60472.64%ApprovedA
WebbJohn Webb (Colorado)   ApprovedAYes1,359,52171.63%ApprovedA
BoorasLaurie Booras   ApprovedAYes1,395,80372.19%ApprovedA

District Courts

First Judicial District

CandidateIncumbentRetention vote:Retention Vote %
PhillipsChristine Bachmeyer Phillips   ApprovedAYes167,95071.29%ApprovedA
MunchChristopher Munch   ApprovedAYes169,14371.39%ApprovedA


Second Judicial District

CandidateIncumbentRetention vote:Retention Vote %
FrickAnn Frick   ApprovedAYes148,15077.47%ApprovedA
LemonCatherine A. Lemon   ApprovedAYes147,44877.84%ApprovedA
LaffKenneth M. Laff   ApprovedAYes135,76072.14%ApprovedA
HoffmanMorris B. Hoffman   ApprovedAYes144,32475.77%ApprovedA
MullinsR. Michael Mullins   ApprovedAYes143,27976.16%ApprovedA
GilmanShelley I. Gilman   ApprovedAYes147,85477.91%ApprovedA


Third Judicial District

CandidateIncumbentRetention vote:Retention Vote %
AppelClaude Appel   ApprovedAYes6,15868.13%ApprovedA

Fourth Judicial District

CandidateIncumbentRetention vote:Retention Vote %
ShakesDavid Shakes   ApprovedAYes169,19673.92%ApprovedA
SchwartzLarry E. Schwartz   ApprovedAYes168,10873.34%ApprovedA
LowreyRobert L. Lowrey   ApprovedAYes171,28674.72%ApprovedA
SellsScott Sells   ApprovedAYes165,56072.57%ApprovedA
CisnerosTheresa M. Cisneros   ApprovedAYes162,93569.92%ApprovedA
SchutzTimothy J. Schutz   ApprovedAYes165,49672.26%ApprovedA


Eighth Judicial District

CandidateIncumbentRetention vote:Retention Vote %
WilliamsDave Williams (Colorado judge)   ApprovedAYes97,88076.08%ApprovedA
OdellDevin R. Odell   ApprovedAYes94,07673.47%ApprovedA


Ninth Judicial District

CandidateIncumbentRetention vote:Retention Vote %
PetreDaniel B. Petre   ApprovedAYes21,31574.65%ApprovedA
BoydJames Berkley Boyd   ApprovedAYes21,97076.61%ApprovedA

Tenth Judicial District

CandidateIncumbentRetention vote:Retention Vote %
CrockenbergDavid W. Crockenberg   ApprovedAYes50,73175.87%ApprovedA
EylerDeborah Eyler   ApprovedAYes49,72175.45%ApprovedA

Eleventh Judicial District

CandidateIncumbentRetention vote:Retention Vote %
BartonCharles Barton   ApprovedAYes24,46870.35%ApprovedA

Twelfth Judicial District

CandidateIncumbentRetention vote:Retention Vote %
SwiftPattie P. Swift   ApprovedAYes14,97477.11%ApprovedA

Thirteenth Judicial District

CandidateIncumbentRetention vote:Retention Vote %
HobbsCharles M. Hobbs   ApprovedAYes19,96370.61%ApprovedA
SingerMichael K. Singer   ApprovedAYes20,21470.71%ApprovedA

Fourteeneth Judicial District

CandidateIncumbentRetention vote:Retention Vote %
O'Hara IIIMichael A. O'Hara III   ApprovedAYes16,48777.08%ApprovedA

Fifteenth Judicial District

CandidateIncumbentRetention vote:Retention Vote %
TallmanDouglas Tallman   ApprovedAYes5,38669.80%ApprovedA

Sixteenth Judicial District

CandidateIncumbentRetention vote:Retention Vote %
KolomitzM. Jon Kolomitz   ApprovedAYes8,02875.39%ApprovedA

Seventeenth Judicial District

CandidateIncumbentRetention vote:Retention Vote %
MelonakisChris Melonakis   ApprovedAYes115,85669.96%ApprovedA
MossEdward C. Moss   ApprovedAYes113,17269.51%ApprovedA

Eighteenth Judicial District

CandidateIncumbentRetention vote:Retention Vote %
CrossChristopher Cross   ApprovedAYes252,98272.28%ApprovedA
HannenJ. Mark Hannen   ApprovedAYes252,36772.52%ApprovedA
HortonKurt Horton   ApprovedAYes238,81268.86%ApprovedA
AntrimMarilyn Antrim   ApprovedAYes234,08366.81%ApprovedA
SpearMichael Spear   ApprovedAYes233,06567.12%ApprovedA

Nineteenth Judicial District

CandidateIncumbentRetention vote:Retention Vote %
TuttleDinsmore Tuttle   ApprovedAYes56,68663.01%ApprovedA
StrobelElizabeth Strobel   ApprovedAYes59,92966.20%ApprovedA
Hartmann, Jr.James F. Hartmann, Jr.   ApprovedAYes64,01270.59%ApprovedA
TaylorTodd Leslie Taylor   ApprovedAYes62,73269.63%ApprovedA

Twentieth Judicial District

CandidateIncumbentRetention vote:Retention Vote %
MallardDolores Mallard   ApprovedAYes97,40878.89%ApprovedA
MulvahillThomas Mulvahill   ApprovedAYes98,32079.64%ApprovedA

Twenty-Second Judicial District

CandidateIncumbentRetention vote:Retention Vote %
PleweTodd Plewe   ApprovedAYes7,81667.56%ApprovedA

County Courts

For information on the County Court elections, visit: Colorado judicial elections, 2012 - County Courts.

Ballot measure

COflagmap.png

Proposed

The Colorado Judicial Reform Amendment (2012) was a proposed initiated constitutional amendment. It was filed by Dennis Polhill and Douglas Campbell. The measure sought to make a number of changes to the state judicial system, including:[1]

  • Changing how judges are appointed.
  • Changing how long judges can serve.
  • Reducing the number of Colorado Supreme Court justices from seven to five.
  • Requiring Senate confirmation hearings for appointees.

The Colorado Supreme Court Term Limit Measure (2012) was a proposed initiated constitutional amendment. It was filed by Peter Coulter. The measure sought to make several changes to the Colorado Supreme Court, including:[2]

  • Reducing terms from ten years to two years.
  • Reducing the length a person can serve as Chief Justice to two years.

Neither measure made the ballot.


In the news

Judge who received negative performance review stands for retention

As featured in JP Election Brief: Retentions, retirements and ratings on September 20, 2012.

Judge Karla J. Hansen of the El Paso County Court plans to stand for retention this year. She will be the only Colorado judge with a "do not retain" recommendation to stand in this year's retention election.[3]

In a 7-2 vote, the State Commission on Judicial Performance decided not to recommend Judge Hansen for retention. In the survey for judicial retention Hansen scored below average in the areas of "treating parties with respect" (2.79/4) and "conducting her courtroom in a neutral manner" (2.68/4). Her overall score was 2.96/4 while the average judge scored 3.29/4.[4][3]

In response, Hansen wrote a letter saying,

I have felt honored to serve the citizens of this county for eleven years. The Judicial Performance Commission has chosen not to include my overall combined survey score of 3.43, compared to an average statewide of 3.45. My survey scores are above average in the areas of work ethic, legal analysis, and efficient case management. I am a no-nonsense judge who follows the letter of the law. I incarcerate dangerous drunk drivers for the protection of the public. Attorneys and non-attorneys who have appeared in my Court recommended retention by a significant majority (72 percent and 93 percent respectively).[5][3][6]
Read the 2012 Judicial Survey Performance Report for Karla Hasen

Colorado 2012 retention elections

As featured in JP Election Brief: 2012 Retention Elections on July 5, 2012.

The state of Colorado has used the merit selection system of judicial selection for all levels of state courts since 1967.[7] Following appointment by the governor, judges must run for retention in the next general election that occurs more than two years after they take office, and at the end of each full term thereafter.[8]

In 1988, the Colorado General Assembly created the State Commission on Judicial Performance "to provide fair, responsible and constructive evaluations of trial and appellate judges and justices" at the state level,[9] and commissions in each judicial district evaluate district and county court judges. They evaluate judges based on surveys of those who come in contact with the judicial system, and "[e]ach evaluation includes a narrative profile with a "Retain," "Do Not Retain," or "No Opinion" recommendation."[10]

This year, Justices Monica Márquez and Nathan Coats are up for retention to the Colorado Supreme Court.[11]

External links

Footnotes