Cynda Riggins-Unger

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Local Politics Image.jpg

Ballotpedia provides comprehensive election coverage of the 100 largest cities in America by population as well as mayoral, city council, and district attorney election coverage in state capitals outside of the 100 largest cities. This judge is outside of that coverage scope and does not receive scheduled updates.


BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the official's last term in office covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Cynda Riggins-Unger
Silhouette Placeholder Image.png
Prior offices:
Superior Court of Solano County
Years in office: 2001 - 2018

Education
Bachelor's
University of California, Davis
Law
McGeorge School of Law


Cynda Riggins-Unger was a judge for the Superior Court of Solano County in Solano County, California.[1] She was first elected to the court in 2000.[2] Riggins-Unger retired on April 30, 2018.[3]

Education

Riggins-Unger received her undergraduate degree from the University of California, Davis and her J.D. from the McGeorge School of Law.[4]

Career

Before her election to the court, Riggins-Unger served as a deputy district attorney for Solano County. She also previously worked as an attorney in private practice for thirteen years.[2]

2012 election

See also: California judicial elections, 2012

Riggins-Unger ran for re-election to the superior court in 2012. As an unopposed incumbent, her name did not appear on the ballot. After the primary election, Unger was automatically re-elected.[5]

Noteworthy events

In July 2014, a petition to recall Judge Riggins-Unger was filed with the Solano County Registrar of Voters. The recall petition alleged that she "often comports herself in a matter that is rude, contentious, often interspersed with insults, violent outbursts of temper directed at the female litigants before her court" and "ignores evidence violating due process rights."[6]

A proponent of the recall stated that they "just want to be treated with patience, kindness and respect, and [they] weren't getting that."[6]

Riggins-Unger, in her response, stated:

"Since family law cases tend to be the most contentious in the courthouse, a family law judge must have the courage to make decisions based only on the evidence and the law and not upon the passions of the litigants or political pressure. My exceptional experience in family law and my steadfast commitment to the law enables me to withstand the disapproval of some litigants in order to do what is right," the response goes on to state.[6][7]

To force a recall election, the petition needed 25,000 signatures by November 2014.[6] However, according to the Facebook page Against Unger Justice 4 Mothers, recall proponents did not gather the necessary number.[8]

See also

External links

Footnotes