Cynthia Freeland

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was last updated during the official's most recent election or appointment. Please contact us with any updates.
Cynthia Freeland

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png

Do you have a photo that could go here? Click here to submit it for this profile!


Superior Court of San Diego County
Tenure
Present officeholder
Term ends

2031

Elections and appointments
Last elected

March 5, 2024

Appointed

December 24, 2016

Education

Bachelor's

University of California, San Deigo

Law

University of San Diego School of Law

Personal
Profession
Attorney

Cynthia Freeland is a judge of the Superior Court of San Diego County in California. Her current term ends on January 6, 2031.

Freeland won re-election for judge of the Superior Court of San Diego County in California outright in the primary on March 5, 2024, after the primary and general election were canceled.

Biography

Freeland received a bachelor's degree from the University of California, San Diego and a J.D. from the University of San Diego School of Law. Below is a summary of her professional experience:[1]

Elections

2024

See also: Municipal elections in San Diego County, California (2024)

Nonpartisan primary election

The primary election was canceled. Cynthia Freeland (Nonpartisan) won the election without appearing on the ballot.

Endorsements

Ballotpedia did not identify endorsements for Freeland in this election.

2018

Nonpartisan primary election

The primary election was canceled. Cynthia Freeland (Nonpartisan) won the election without appearing on the ballot.

Selection method

See also: Nonpartisan election

The 1,535 judges of the California Superior Courts compete in nonpartisan races in even-numbered years. If a candidate receives more than 50 percent of the vote in the June primary election, he or she is declared the winner; if no candidate receives more than 50 percent of the vote, a runoff between the top two candidates is held during the November general election.[2][3][4][5]

If an incumbent judge is running unopposed in an election, his or her name does not appear on the ballot. The judge is automatically re-elected following the general election.[2]

The chief judge of any given superior court is selected by peer vote of the court's members. He or she serves in that capacity for one or two years, depending on the county.[2]

Qualifications
Candidates are required to have 10 years of experience as a law practitioner or as a judge of a court of record.[2]

Campaign themes

2024

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Cynthia Freeland did not complete Ballotpedia's 2024 Candidate Connection survey.

Noteworthy cases

A.A. v. Newsom (2021)

See also: Lawsuits about state actions and policies in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, 2020

A.A. v. Newsom: On March 17, 2021, a San Diego County judge temporarily blocked the enforcement of various school reopening provisions across California after a group of parents of public-school children filed suit. Under the state's school reopening plan, middle and high schools located in "purple" counties (i.e., counties with between 7 and 10 COVID-19 cases per 100,000 residents) were prohibited from reopening. The plaintiffs also challenged the plan's requirement that reopened schools maintain at least four feet between students in classrooms. The plaintiffs argued that these provisions violated California’s constitutional and statutory guarantees of a quality education, education equality, separation of powers, and due process. In her order, San Diego County Superior Court Judge Cynthia Freeland sided with the plaintiffs, calling the state's school reopening plan "selective in its applicability, vague in its terms, and arbitrary in its prescriptions." In response to Freeland's order, California Health and Human Services Agency spokesman Rodger Butler said that the state would "continue to lead with science and health as we review this order and assess our legal options with a focus on the health and safety of California’s children and schools." Scott Davidson, an attorney for the plaintiffs, called the ruling "a huge validation of our position that remote learning is a failure, that education is a constitutional right and that these kids have been denied their right to an education with remote learning."[6][7][8]

See also


External links

Footnotes