Cynthia Kinser

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the official's last term in office covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Cynthia Kinser
Silhouette Placeholder Image.png
Prior offices:
Supreme Court of Virginia
Education
Bachelor's
University of Tennessee
Law
University of Virginia School of Law, 1976


Cynthia Kinser was the chief justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia. Justice Kinser was appointed by Republican Governor George Allen in 1997. She was re-elected by the Virginia General Assembly for another 12-year term on January 26, 2010.[1]

On August 31, 2010, Kinser was elected to a four-year term as chief justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia, effective February 2010.[2] She became the first female chief justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia.[3] She retired from the bench in 2014.[4]

Education

Kinser received her undergraduate degree from the University of Tennessee and in 1976 and her J.D. from the University of Virginia Law School.[5]

Career

After graduating from law school, Kinser clerked for Glen M. Williams. She spent a year in private practice, then was elected to serve as a commonwealth attorney for Lee County. After one term, she entered private practice again. In 1990, Kinser was appointed a U.S. magistrate judge. She served in this capacity until her appointment to the Supreme Court of Virginia in 1997.[5]

Political ideology

See also: Political ideology of State Supreme Court Justices

In October 2012, political science professors Adam Bonica and Michael Woodruff of Stanford University attempted to determine the partisan ideology of state supreme court justices. They created a scoring system in which a score above 0 indicated a more conservative-leaning ideology, while scores below 0 were more liberal.

Kinser received a campaign finance score of 0.94, indicating a conservative ideological leaning. This was more conservative than the average score of 0.11 that justices received in Virginia.

The study was based on data from campaign contributions by the judges themselves, the partisan leaning of those who contributed to the judges' campaigns, or, in the absence of elections, the ideology of the appointing body (governor or legislature). This study was not a definitive label of a justice, but an academic summary of various relevant factors.[6]

See also

External links

Footnotes