Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

DANIEL COLEMAN, PETITIONER v. COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND et al. (2012)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
DANIEL COLEMAN, PETITIONER v. COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND et al.
Term: 2011
Important Dates
Argued: January 11, 2012
Decided: March 20, 2012
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
5-4
Majority
Samuel AlitoAnthony KennedyJohn RobertsClarence Thomas
Concurring
Antonin Scalia
Dissenting
Stephen BreyerRuth Bader GinsburgElena KaganSonia Sotomayor

DANIEL COLEMAN, PETITIONER v. COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 20, 2012. The case was argued before the court on January 11, 2012.

In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Maryland U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 2010s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Federalism - national supremacy: marital and family relationships and property, including obligation of child support
  • Petitioner: Retired or former governmental employee
  • Petitioner state: Maryland
  • Respondent type: State
  • Respondent state: Maryland
  • Citation: 566 U.S. 30
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Judgment of the Court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Anthony Kennedy

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes