Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
DAVID BOBBY, WARDEN, PETITIONER, v. HARRY MITTS (2011)

| DAVID BOBBY, WARDEN, PETITIONER, v. HARRY MITTS |
|---|
| Term: 2010 |
| Important Dates |
| Decided: May 2, 2011 |
| Outcome |
| Reversed |
| Vote |
| 9-0 |
| Majority |
| Samuel Alito • Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Elena Kagan • Anthony Kennedy • John Roberts • Antonin Scalia • Sonia Sotomayor • Clarence Thomas |
DAVID BOBBY, WARDEN, PETITIONER, v. HARRY MITTS is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 2, 2011.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Ohio Northern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2010s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Extra-legal jury influences: jurors and death penalty (cf. cruel and unusual punishment)
- Petitioner: State
- Petitioner state: Ohio
- Respondent type: Person convicted of crime
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 563 U.S. 395
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Per curiam (no oral argument)
- Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Unknown
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes