Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
DAVID BOBBY, WARDEN v. ARCHIE DIXON (2011)

| DAVID BOBBY, WARDEN v. ARCHIE DIXON |
|---|
| Term: 2011 |
| Important Dates |
| Decided: November 7, 2011 |
| Outcome |
| Reversed and remanded |
| Vote |
| 9-0 |
| Majority |
| Samuel Alito • Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Elena Kagan • Anthony Kennedy • John Roberts • Antonin Scalia • Sonia Sotomayor • Clarence Thomas |
DAVID BOBBY, WARDEN v. ARCHIE DIXON is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on November 7, 2011.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Ohio Northern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2010s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Miranda warnings
- Petitioner: State
- Petitioner state: Ohio
- Respondent type: Prisoner, inmate of penal institution
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 565 U.S. 23
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Per curiam (no oral argument)
- Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Unknown
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes