DAVID D. MITCHELL, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. MANUEL X. HARMONY (1852)

![]() |
DAVID D. MITCHELL, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. MANUEL X. HARMONY |
---|
Term: 1851 |
Important Dates |
Argued: April 19, 1852 |
Decided: May 12, 1852 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
8-1 |
Majority |
John Catron • Benjamin Robbins Curtis • Robert Cooper Grier • John McKinley • John McLean • Samuel Nelson • Roger Brooke Taney • James Moore Wayne |
Dissenting |
Peter Vivian Daniel |
DAVID D. MITCHELL, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. MANUEL X. HARMONY is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 12, 1852. The case was argued before the court on April 19, 1852.
In an 8-1 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the New York U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of New York.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1850s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Taney Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Due Process - Due process: takings clause, or other non-constitutional governmental taking of property
- Petitioner: Military personnel, or dependent of, including reservist
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Injured person or legal entity, nonphysically and non-employment related
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 54 U.S. 115
- How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Roger Brooke Taney
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Roger Brooke Taney
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes