Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
DAWUD MAJID MU'MIN v. VIRGINIA (1991)
- Justices
- CASES BY TERM
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2025-2026
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2024-2025
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2023-2024
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2022-2023
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2021-2022
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2020-2021
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2019-2020
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2018-2019
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2017-2018
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2016-2017
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2015-2016
- All earlier cases
- HISTORY OF THE COURT
- Recent vacancies
 |
| DAWUD MAJID MU'MIN v. VIRGINIA |
|---|
| Term: 1990 |
| Important Dates |
| Argued: February 20, 1991 |
| Decided: May 30, 1991 |
| Outcome |
| Affirmed (includes modified) |
| Vote |
| 5-4 |
| Majority |
| William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia • David Souter • Byron White |
| Concurring |
| Sandra Day O'Connor |
| Dissenting |
| Harry Blackmun • Anthony Kennedy • Thurgood Marshall • John Paul Stevens |
DAWUD MAJID MU'MIN v. VIRGINIA is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 30, 1991. The case was argued before the court on February 20, 1991.
In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Virginia State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Extra-legal jury influences: voir dire (not necessarily a criminal case)
- Petitioner: Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: State
- Respondent state: Virginia
- Citation: 500 U.S. 415
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: William Rehnquist
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes
