Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
DEMARCUS ALI SEARS v. STEPHEN UPTON, WARDEN (2010)

![]() |
DEMARCUS ALI SEARS v. STEPHEN UPTON, WARDEN |
---|
Term: 2009 |
Important Dates |
Decided: June 29, 2010 |
Outcome |
Vacated and remanded |
Vote |
5-4 |
Majority |
Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Anthony Kennedy • Sonia Sotomayor • John Paul Stevens |
Dissenting |
Samuel Alito • John Roberts • Antonin Scalia • Clarence Thomas |
DEMARCUS ALI SEARS v. STEPHEN UPTON, WARDEN is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 29, 2010.
In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Georgia State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Right to counsel (cf. indigents appointment of counsel or inadequate representation)
- Petitioner: Person convicted of crime
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: State
- Respondent state: Georgia
- Citation: 561 U.S. 945
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Per curiam (no oral argument)
- Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Unknown
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes