Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.
DIAMOND, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS v. BRADLEY ET AL (1981)

![]() |
DIAMOND, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS v. BRADLEY ET AL |
---|
Term: 1980 |
Important Dates |
Argued: October 14, 1980 |
Decided: March 9, 1981 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
4-4 |
Equally divided vote |
Harry Blackmun • William Brennan • Warren Burger • Thurgood Marshall • Lewis Powell • John Paul Stevens • Potter Stewart • Byron White |
DIAMOND, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS v. BRADLEY ET AL is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 9, 1981. The case was argued before the court on October 14, 1980.
In a 4-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the U.S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1980s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Burger Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - Patents and copyrights: patentability of computer processes
- Petitioner: Patent Office, or Commissioner of, or Board of Appeals of
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Inventor, patent assigner, trademark owner or holder
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 450 U.S. 381
- How the court took jurisdiction: Appeal
- What type of decision was made: Equally divided vote
- Who was the chief justice: Warren Burger
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Unknown
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes