Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
DIAMOND, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS v. CHAKRABARTY (1980)

![]() |
DIAMOND, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS v. CHAKRABARTY |
---|
Term: 1979 |
Important Dates |
Argued: March 17, 1980 |
Decided: June 16, 1980 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
5-4 |
Majority |
Harry Blackmun • Warren Burger • William Rehnquist • John Paul Stevens • Potter Stewart |
Dissenting |
William Brennan • Thurgood Marshall • Lewis Powell • Byron White |
DIAMOND, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS v. CHAKRABARTY is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 16, 1980. The case was argued before the court on March 17, 1980.
In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the U.S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1970s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Burger Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - Patents and copyrights: patent
- Petitioner: United States
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Inventor, patent assigner, trademark owner or holder
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 447 U.S. 303
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Warren Burger
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Warren Burger
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes