Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
DIAMOND RUBBER COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. CONSOLIDATED RUBBER TIRE COMPANY (1911)

![]() |
DIAMOND RUBBER COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. CONSOLIDATED RUBBER TIRE COMPANY |
---|
Term: 1910 |
Important Dates |
Argued: February 28, 1911 |
Decided: April 10, 1911 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
7-0 |
Majority |
John Marshall Harlan • Oliver Wendell Holmes • Charles Evans Hughes • Joseph Rucker Lamar • Joseph McKenna • Willis Van Devanter • Edward Douglass White |
DIAMOND RUBBER COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. CONSOLIDATED RUBBER TIRE COMPANY is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on April 10, 1911. The case was argued before the court on February 28, 1911.
In a 7-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the New York U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of New York.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1910s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the White Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - Patents and copyrights: patent
- Petitioner: Manufacturer
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Inventor, patent assigner, trademark owner or holder
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 220 U.S. 428
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Edward Douglass White
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Joseph McKenna
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes