Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES, INC. AND NICK LOMBARDI v. PAUL CASAROTTO ET UX. (1996)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES, INC. AND NICK LOMBARDI v. PAUL CASAROTTO ET UX.
Term: 1995
Important Dates
Argued: April 16, 1996
Decided: May 20, 1996
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
8-1
Majority
Stephen BreyerRuth Bader GinsburgAnthony KennedySandra Day O'ConnorWilliam RehnquistAntonin ScaliaDavid SouterJohn Paul Stevens
Dissenting
Clarence Thomas

DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES, INC. AND NICK LOMBARDI v. PAUL CASAROTTO ET UX. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 20, 1996. The case was argued before the court on April 16, 1996.

In an 8-1 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Montana State Trial Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Federalism - federal pre-emption of state legislation or regulation. cf. state regulation of business. rarely involves union activity. Does not involve constitutional interpretation unless the Court says it does.
  • Petitioner: Franchiser
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Franchisee
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 517 U.S. 681
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Ruth Bader Ginsburg

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes