Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

DOMINGO DIAZ A., et al. v. PATTERSON (1923)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
DOMINGO DIAZ A., et al. v. PATTERSON
Term: 1923
Important Dates
Argued: November 28, 1923
Decided: December 10, 1923
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
9-0
Majority
Louis Dembitz BrandeisPierce ButlerOliver Wendell HolmesJoseph McKennaJames Clark McReynoldsEdward Terry SanfordGeorge SutherlandWilliam Howard TaftWillis Van Devanter

DOMINGO DIAZ A., et al. v. PATTERSON is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on December 10, 1923. The case was argued before the court on November 28, 1923.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the U.S. District Court for the Canal Zone.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1920s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Taft Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Private Action - Real property
  • Petitioner: Heir, or beneficiary, or person so claiming to be
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 263 U.S. 399
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Appeal
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Howard Taft
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Oliver Wendell Holmes

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as unspecifiable.

See also

External links

Footnotes