Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
DONALD BULLCOMING, PETITIONER v. NEW MEXICO (2011)

![]() |
DONALD BULLCOMING, PETITIONER v. NEW MEXICO |
---|
Term: 2010 |
Important Dates |
Argued: March 2, 2011 |
Decided: June 23, 2011 |
Outcome |
Reversed and remanded |
Vote |
5-4 |
Majority |
Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Elena Kagan • Antonin Scalia • Clarence Thomas |
Concurring |
Sonia Sotomayor |
Dissenting |
Samuel Alito • Stephen Breyer • Anthony Kennedy • John Roberts |
DONALD BULLCOMING, PETITIONER v. NEW MEXICO is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 23, 2011. The case was argued before the court on March 2, 2011.
In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the New Mexico State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2010s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Confrontation (right to confront accuser, call and cross-examine witnesses)
- Petitioner: Defendant
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: State
- Respondent state: New Mexico
- Citation: 564 U.S. 647
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Ruth Bader Ginsburg
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes