Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

DONALD BULLCOMING, PETITIONER v. NEW MEXICO (2011)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
DONALD BULLCOMING, PETITIONER v. NEW MEXICO
Term: 2010
Important Dates
Argued: March 2, 2011
Decided: June 23, 2011
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
5-4
Majority
Ruth Bader GinsburgElena KaganAntonin ScaliaClarence Thomas
Concurring
Sonia Sotomayor
Dissenting
Samuel AlitoStephen BreyerAnthony KennedyJohn Roberts

DONALD BULLCOMING, PETITIONER v. NEW MEXICO is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 23, 2011. The case was argued before the court on March 2, 2011.

In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the New Mexico State Trial Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 2010s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Confrontation (right to confront accuser, call and cross-examine witnesses)
  • Petitioner: Defendant
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: State
  • Respondent state: New Mexico
  • Citation: 564 U.S. 647
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Ruth Bader Ginsburg

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes