Danny Chun

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Local Politics Image.jpg

Ballotpedia provides comprehensive election coverage of the 100 largest cities in America by population as well as mayoral, city council, and district attorney election coverage in state capitals outside of the 100 largest cities. This judge is outside of that coverage scope and does not receive scheduled updates.


BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was last updated during the official's most recent election or appointment. Please contact us with any updates.
Danny Chun

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png

Do you have a photo that could go here? Click here to submit it for this profile!


New York Supreme Court 2nd Judicial District
Tenure
Present officeholder
Term ends

2032

Education

Law

Fordham University School of Law

Danny Chun is an acting justice of the Kings County Supreme Court, Criminal Term in the 2nd Judicial District of New York. He was appointed to this position in 2005. He has also served on the New York City Criminal Court of Kings County since 1999.[1][2]

Education

Chun is a graduate of the Fordham University School of Law.[1]

Career

Chun began his career in 1987 as an assistant New York County district attorney. He was then appointed to the Kings County Criminal Court in 1999. He was appointed an acting Supreme Court Justice in 2005 and, for a brief time that year, he was assigned to the Kings County Family Court.[1]

Noteworthy cases

Judge Danny Chun sentenced two New York Police Department detectives to five years of probation after they pleaded guilty to official misconduct and bribe receiving. The case came out of a 2017 incident in which the former officers allegedly had sex with a woman in their custody in exchange for her release.[3]

Chun explained his sentencing, saying that while the officers accepted a bribe, the woman in their custody could also be charged with offering a bribe. “In this particular case … the other party offering a bribe could also be charged and could also be guilty of offering a bribe or giving a bribe,” Chun said. "Given that there are criminal activities on both sides, however, there is one critical difference here — both the defendants before me are police officers and police officers are sworn to uphold a higher standard of ethical code, behavior or higher standard, period, than other people engaged in criminal activity.” Chun also questioned the credibility of the officers' accuser.[4]

External links

Footnotes