Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

David Medina

From Ballotpedia
(Redirected from David M. Medina)
Jump to: navigation, search
David Medina
Image of David Medina
Prior offices
Texas Supreme Court Place 4

Education

Bachelor's

Southwest Texas State University, 1980

Law

South Texas College of Law, 1989


David M. Medina was a justice of the Texas Supreme Court, in Place 4. He was elected to a full-term on November 7, 2006, after being appointed by Governor Rick Perry on November 10, 2004.[1] He left the court on December 31, 2012, after an unsuccessful bid for re-election.

Education

Medina received his B.S. degree from Southwest Texas State University in 1980 and his J.D. from South Texas College of Law in 1989.[2]

Career

Medina began working for Cooper Industries in 1987 and after graduating law school, became litigation counsel in 1989. He worked there until his appointment to the District 157 Court in May 1996. He served in this capacity until 2000, when he went back to Cooper Industries, as Associate General Counsel for Litigation. In 2004, Medina served as General Counsel to the governor, and that year, Governor Rick Perry appointed him to the Texas Supreme Court.[3][2]

2012 election

Medina won 37.74 percent of the vote in the Republican primary on May 29, 2012. Because no candidate received over 50 percent of the vote, he and John Devine competed in a primary runoff on July 31, 2012.[4] Medina was defeated in the runoff, receiving 46.69 percent of the vote to John Devine's 53.3%.[5]

See also: Texas judicial elections, 2012

Awards and associations

  • Board Member, Spring Klein Baseball Association
  • Former Board Member, Habitat for Humanity
  • Former Board Member, Houston Metro
  • Adjunct professor, South Texas College of Law[3]

Noteworthy cases

Church practices (2008)

Medina ruled in 2008 that a church’s religious practice of “laying hands” is entitled to First Amendment protection against a member’s emotional damage claims arising out of tort. "Assessing emotional damages against a church for engaging in theses religious practices would unconstitutionally burden [the church’s] right to free exercise and embroil the Court in an assessment of the propriety of those religious beliefs."[6]

Political ideology

See also: Political ideology of State Supreme Court Justices

In October 2012, political science professors Adam Bonica and Michael Woodruff of Stanford University attempted to determine the partisan ideology of state supreme court justices. They created a scoring system in which a score above 0 indicated a more conservative-leaning ideology, while scores below 0 were more liberal.

Medina received a campaign finance score of 0.81, indicating a conservative ideological leaning. This was less conservative than the average score of 0.91 that justices received in Texas.

The study was based on data from campaign contributions by the judges themselves, the partisan leaning of those who contributed to the judges' campaigns, or, in the absence of elections, the ideology of the appointing body (governor or legislature). This study was not a definitive label of a justice, but an academic summary of various relevant factors.[7]

See also

External links

Footnotes