Dawn Marshall
Dawn Marshall (Democratic Party) ran for election to the U.S. House to represent Texas' 10th Congressional District. She lost in the Democratic primary on March 3, 2026.
Marshall completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2026. Click here to read the survey answers.
Biography
Dawn Marshall earned a high school diploma from Monona Grove High School and a Ph.D. from Texas A&M University in 2007. Her career experience includes working as an educator.[1]
Elections
2026
See also: Texas' 10th Congressional District election, 2026
Texas' 10th Congressional District election, 2026 (March 3 Republican primary)
Texas' 10th Congressional District election, 2026 (March 3 Democratic primary)
General election
The candidate list in this election may not be complete.
General election for U.S. House Texas District 10
Caitlin Rourk and Chris Gober are running in the general election for U.S. House Texas District 10 on November 3, 2026.
Candidate | ||
 | Caitlin Rourk (D)  | |
 | Chris Gober (R) | |
| ||||
| = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Democratic primary election
Democratic primary for U.S. House Texas District 10
Caitlin Rourk defeated Dawn Marshall and Bernie Reyna in the Democratic primary for U.S. House Texas District 10 on March 3, 2026.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ | | Caitlin Rourk | 61.0 | 32,450 |
 | Dawn Marshall | 22.6 | 12,006 | |
 | Bernie Reyna | 16.5 | 8,769 | |
| Total votes: 53,225 | |||
| = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
- Linda Trevino (D)
- Sarah Eckhardt (D)
- Tayhlor Coleman (D)
Republican primary election
Republican primary for U.S. House Texas District 10
The following candidates ran in the Republican primary for U.S. House Texas District 10 on March 3, 2026.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ | | Chris Gober | 51.2 | 38,410 |
 | Ben Bius | 14.0 | 10,460 | |
 | Rob Altman | 7.5 | 5,650 | |
 | Jessica Karlsruher | 7.1 | 5,332 | |
 | Scott MacLeod | 6.7 | 5,040 | |
 | Jeremy Story | 4.5 | 3,384 | |
 | Kara King | 2.9 | 2,144 | |
 | Jenny Garcia Sharon | 2.4 | 1,786 | |
 | Robert Brown | 2.4 | 1,768 | |
 | Brandon Hawbaker | 1.3 | 973 | |
| Total votes: 74,947 | |||
| = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
- Joshua Ross Lovell (R)
- Phil Suarez (R)
- Carl Segan (R)
- Christopher Hurt (R)
Endorsements
Ballotpedia is gathering information about candidate endorsements. To send us an endorsement, click here.
Campaign themes
2026
Ballotpedia survey responses
See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection
Dawn Marshall completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2026. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Marshall's responses.
| Collapse all
- In Central Texas, particularly across the diverse and rapidly growing communities of U.S. House District 10, Medicare and Medicaid are not just programs—they are lifelines. From rural towns like Giddings and Pointblank to expanding suburbs like Navasota, thousands of seniors, low-income families, children, and individuals with disabilities rely on these services for essential health care. For many, Medicaid is the only access point for preventive care, maternal health, and treatment for chronic conditions. For our aging population, Medicare provides the security and dignity that every person deserves after a lifetime of work. Yet, in a state that has repeatedly refused to expand Medicaid coverage, the stakes are even higher. Texas has one
- Central Texas, particularly U.S. House District 10, is facing a growing crisis of affordable housing. From fast-growing suburbs like Pflugerville and larger cities like Austin to smaller cities like College Station and Bryan, working families, seniors, and young professionals are being priced out of the communities they call home. Rising property taxes, stagnant wages, and the unchecked cost of rent have outpaced the ability of everyday Texans to secure stable housing. Meanwhile, teachers, nurses, service workers, and first responders—those who keep our communities running—are often forced to live farther and farther from their jobs, adding to traffic congestion and eroding quality of life. In Congress, leadership on this issue is long ov
- Rural families across Central Texas face unique challenges when it comes to immigration enforcement, and ICE raids have far-reaching consequences for communities that rely heavily on immigrant labor. Towns like Bellville, Brenham, Sealy, and smaller agricultural hubs in U.S. House District 10 are home to many families with mixed immigration status, where some members are documented U.S. citizens or legal residents while others are undocumented. Aggressive immigration enforcement, including ICE raids on farms, small businesses, and homes, disrupts the stability of these households and creates widespread fear that reverberates through entire communities. One of the most immediate effects of ICE raids in rural Central Texas is the economic
In today’s political landscape, federal elections are often dominated by the highest bidders. The 2024 election cycle alone saw over $17 billion in campaign spending, much of it funneled through super PACs.
Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.
Campaign website
Marshall's campaign website stated the following:
CAMPAIGN FINANCE
Why America Urgently Needs Campaign Finance Reform for Federal Elections
Campaign finance reform is no longer just a political talking point—it is a necessary step toward restoring the health of American democracy. With billions of dollars flowing into each federal election cycle, the influence of wealthy donors, corporate political action committees (PACs), and untraceable dark money has grown dramatically. This shift in power away from ordinary voters and toward elite interests has distorted the democratic process and weakened public trust in government institutions.
In today’s political landscape, federal elections are often dominated by the highest bidders. The 2024 election cycle alone saw over $17 billion in campaign spending, much of it funneled through super PACs and organizations that are not required to disclose their donors. As a result, elected officials may feel more accountable to the funders of their campaigns than to the constituents they were elected to represent. The consequences are wide-ranging: policy priorities skew toward those with financial influence, grassroots candidates without deep-pocketed backers struggle to compete, and voters grow increasingly cynical about whether their voices still matter. The notion of “one person, one vote” has been compromised by a system that rewards wealth with access and power.
Campaign finance reform is critical for restoring balance, fairness, and integrity to our elections. The current system permits unlimited outside spending, tolerates weak disclosure rules, and enables a flood of corporate and special interest money to shape political outcomes. Reform would reduce the influence of big money in federal campaigns and prioritize transparency and accountability. It would amplify the voices of everyday Americans, allowing small-dollar donors and grassroots supporters to have a meaningful impact on political discourse. Most importantly, it would re-establish public confidence in elected leaders by making sure their priorities reflect the will of the people, not the preferences of billionaire donors and lobbying firms.
There are a number of concrete steps that could strengthen our campaign finance system. Public financing of campaigns could match small-dollar donations with public funds, leveling the playing field between wealthy candidates and those without access to large donors. Tighter donation limits would help curb the excessive influence of mega-donors. Many reform advocates are also calling for the reversal of Citizens United v. FEC, the Supreme Court decision that opened the door to unlimited corporate spending in politics. In addition, stronger disclosure laws would ensure voters know exactly who is financing political campaigns and why. By banning foreign-influenced contributions and closing loopholes that allow anonymous spending, the government can safeguard elections from outside interference and manipulation.
Failing to act on campaign finance reform puts the country at continued risk of deepening political inequality. When wealthy donors can buy influence and corporations can bankroll entire elections, the policies that emerge reflect those financial interests rather than the public good. Vital legislation on healthcare, the environment, education, and workers' rights is often shaped or stalled not by reasoned debate, but by the sway of campaign contributions and lobbyist pressure. As Americans watch this unfold, many become disillusioned and disengaged, further weakening the democratic process.
What makes this issue even more urgent is that public support for reform is widespread and bipartisan. Voters across the political spectrum agree that money has too much influence in politics and that candidates should be accountable to people, not PACs. Whether Republican, Democrat, or Independent, Americans overwhelmingly support transparency, fairness, and limits on campaign spending. They are ready for a system where political success is based on values and ideas—not wealth and connections.
Now is the time to take bold action. Congress must move to pass comprehensive campaign finance legislation such as the For the People Act or the DISCLOSE Act.
Lawmakers should commit to ending dark money influence, expanding public financing options, and supporting a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United. These reforms are not about tilting elections toward one party or another—they are about protecting democracy itself. A fair, transparent, and accountable system of campaign financing is essential for ensuring that our government reflects the will of the people, not the power of money.
FEDERAL CUTS IMPACT TEXAS A&M
Federal funding cuts have significantly disrupted research, outreach, and sustainability efforts at Texas A&M University in College Station. Here's how:
Texas A&M has seen major losses from USDA-funded climate-smart agriculture grants. A $65 million award through the Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities was abruptly canceled, undermining research and outreach led by the university’s AgriLife Research division on practices like cover cropping and soil regeneration that benefit Central Texas producers.
In tandem, proposed cuts from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) threatened to drastically reduce support for research infrastructure by slashing permitted indirect cost rates from over 50 percent down to just 15 percent. That far exceeded NIH’s historical norms and would have devastated Texas A&M’s ability to fund essential facilities, staff, and administrative support for biomedical research. A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order in response, but uncertainty remains.
These funding disruptions have introduced significant uncertainty into the research climate at Texas A&M. Although the university continues to coordinate closely with principal investigators and government offices, administrators confirm that several NEH grants have already been terminated or paused, negating planned support for ongoing projects . The cumulative effect: researchers face looming funding gaps, halted or delayed studies, and a scramble for alternative resources.
Leadership at Texas A&M concurs that these federal cuts strain the institution’s ability to serve its mission. University President Mark Welsh and Provost Alan Sams have said in public and internal briefings that the cuts not only threaten major research initiatives, but also risk weakening university capacity to support faculty, staff, and students across academic and outreach programs.
MEDICARE / MEDICAID
In Central Texas, particularly across the diverse and rapidly growing communities of U.S. House District 10, Medicare and Medicaid are not just programs—they are lifelines. From rural towns like Bellville and Brenham to expanding suburbs like Katy and Cypress, thousands of seniors, low-income families, children, and individuals with disabilities rely on these services for essential health care. For many, Medicaid is the only access point for preventive care, maternal health, and treatment for chronic conditions. For our aging population, Medicare provides the security and dignity that every person deserves after a lifetime of work.
Yet, in a state that has repeatedly refused to expand Medicaid coverage, the stakes are even higher. Texas has one of the highest uninsured rates in the country, and District 10 reflects that crisis. Hospitals and clinics are stretched thin, rural healthcare is under threat, and working families are forced to choose between medical bills and basic necessities. We need leadership in Congress that defends and strengthens Medicare and Medicaid—not one that votes to gut them. Protecting these programs means protecting the health, stability, and future of Central Texas.
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Central Texas, particularly U.S. House District 10, is facing a growing crisis of affordable housing. From fast-growing suburbs like Pflugerville and Manor to smaller cities like Brenham and Sealy, working families, seniors, and young professionals are being priced out of the communities they call home. Rising property taxes, stagnant wages, and the unchecked cost of rent have outpaced the ability of everyday Texans to secure stable housing. Meanwhile, teachers, nurses, service workers, and first responders—those who keep our communities running—are often forced to live farther and farther from their jobs, adding to traffic congestion and eroding quality of life.
In Congress, leadership on this issue is long overdue. District 10 needs a representative who will advocate for federal investment in mixed-income housing developments, support tax incentives for affordable housing construction, and fight for smart zoning reforms that respect community character while opening doors to homeownership and long-term stability. Safe, affordable housing isn’t a luxury—it’s a foundation for opportunity, and it’s time Central Texas had a champion in Washington who treats it that way.
IMMIGRATION
The Impact of ICE Raids and Immigration Enforcement on Rural Families in Central Texas
Rural families across Central Texas face unique challenges when it comes to immigration enforcement, and ICE raids have far-reaching consequences for communities that rely heavily on immigrant labor. Towns like Bellville, Brenham, Sealy, and smaller agricultural hubs in U.S. House District 10 are home to many families with mixed immigration status, where some members are documented U.S. citizens or legal residents while others are undocumented. Aggressive immigration enforcement, including ICE raids on farms, small businesses, and homes, disrupts the stability of these households and creates widespread fear that reverberates through entire communities.
One of the most immediate effects of ICE raids in rural Central Texas is the economic and emotional disruption to farmworkers and local labor forces. Many rural economies rely on immigrant labor to harvest crops, tend livestock, and support food processing operations. When ICE raids remove workers from the workforce, farms and local businesses face labor shortages, reduced productivity, and financial strain. Families left behind struggle to maintain household income, care for children, and manage essential expenses such as rent, utilities, and healthcare. This instability affects not just undocumented workers but also their U.S.-born children and family members who depend on their support.
Children in Central Texas are particularly vulnerable when immigration enforcement targets their parents or guardians. Mixed-status households often experience trauma, anxiety, and fear of separation, which can impact mental health, school attendance, and academic performance. Schools and community organizations report increased stress among students whose parents face detention or deportation, undermining educational outcomes and social stability in rural communities. ICE enforcement also discourages families from accessing critical public services, including healthcare, social programs, and nutrition assistance, because of fear of exposure. This results in decreased utilization of programs designed to support vulnerable families and compromises the overall health of the community.
Healthcare access is another critical concern. Rural Central Texas is already underserved in medical infrastructure, and undocumented residents often delay or forgo care due to fear of immigration enforcement. ICE raids can exacerbate these barriers, leaving families without preventive care or treatment for chronic conditions. Community clinics, local hospitals, and nonprofit organizations often struggle to provide services while managing heightened fear and uncertainty among patients. This public health impact extends beyond undocumented individuals, affecting families, schools, and workplaces throughout rural Central Texas.
The social fabric of rural communities is also at risk. ICE raids create a climate of fear and mistrust, eroding community cohesion and participation. Families may avoid public gatherings, local businesses, and even religious institutions out of concern for enforcement actions. This sense of instability undermines civic engagement and weakens local economies, as residents limit spending and participation in communal activities. In agricultural towns where immigrant families contribute not only labor but also cultural and social capital, the consequences of enforcement reach far beyond immediate household disruptions.
In addition, ICE raids contribute to long-term demographic and economic challenges in rural Central Texas. Families may relocate preemptively to avoid enforcement, leading to population decline and reduced workforce availability. Local schools, businesses, and service providers face declining participation, further weakening the economic and social resilience of these communities. Protecting the stability of rural families and promoting fair, humane immigration policies is essential for maintaining the vitality of Central Texas.
In conclusion, ICE raids and aggressive immigration enforcement have profound and lasting impacts on rural families across Central Texas. From economic disruption and labor shortages to trauma among children, decreased access to healthcare, and erosion of community cohesion, these actions threaten the well-being of entire communities. Policymakers must recognize that immigration enforcement is not just a matter of law—it is a family and community issue. Ensuring fair, humane, and consistent immigration policies is essential to protect the health, stability, and future of Central Texas families.
RISING INFLATION
Rising inflation has hit hard across Central Texas, and nowhere is that more evident than in U.S. House District 10. From the grocery store aisles in College Station to the gas pumps in Elgin and the housing markets in Katy and Lakeway, families are feeling the squeeze. Everyday essentials like food, fuel, rent, and healthcare have become significantly more expensive, while wages struggle to keep up. For working parents, seniors on fixed incomes, and small business owners, this economic pressure is not abstract—it’s a daily burden.
In a district that spans both rural and suburban communities, inflation affects everything from the cost of commuting long distances to access jobs, to keeping local farms and small businesses afloat. We need real solutions in Congress that prioritize working families over corporate profits—policies that lower prescription drug prices, bring supply chains home, strengthen energy independence, and support responsible fiscal policy. Central Texans deserve a representative who understands that affordability is key to opportunity—and who is ready to fight for economic fairness and stability in every zip code of District 10.
Do tariffs impact inflation?
Tariffs increase the overall cost of goods by imposing taxes on imported products, which raises the price that importers must pay to bring those goods into the country. These added costs are typically passed on to consumers in the form of higher retail prices.
When everyday items like electronics, clothing, appliances, or raw materials such as steel and aluminum become more expensive due to tariffs, businesses and manufacturers also face increased production expenses. As a result, they often raise their prices to maintain profit margins.
This chain reaction leads to what economists call cost-push inflation, where the rising costs of inputs and goods throughout the economy push the overall price level higher. In effect, tariffs reduce competition, limit supply options, and drive up costs across multiple sectors, contributing to a broad and sustained increase in inflation.
REDISTRICTING
Donald Trump’s Redistricting Demand Threatens Democracy in Texas
In a stunning and dangerous move, former President Donald J. Trump has called on Governor Greg Abbott and the Texas State Legislature to undertake a mid-decade redistricting process—an unprecedented power grab that threatens the very foundation of representative democracy in Texas. Under pressure from Trump, Republican lawmakers are seeking to redraw congressional maps well before the next Census, with the clear intent of silencing Democratic voices, targeting communities of color, and rigging future elections in favor of the GOP.
This blatant attempt at partisan gerrymandering could strip power from Black, Latino, and urban voters in Central Texas and beyond, undermining fair representation in Washington. Rather than focusing on real issues like public education, flood recovery, healthcare, and infrastructure, Texas Republicans are prioritizing political manipulation at the expense of voter trust and constitutional fairness.
Democratic activists and voting rights organizations across the state are sounding the alarm. They are organizing, mobilizing, and challenging this authoritarian tactic to ensure every Texan—regardless of race, ZIP code, or party affiliation—has a voice that counts. Now more than ever, Texans must stay informed, speak out, and defend the right to fair maps and equal representation.
What is redistricting?
Redistricting (noun – politics) Redistricting is the process of redrawing the boundaries of electoral districts to reflect changes in population, usually after each U.S. Census (every 10 years). The goal is to ensure that each district has roughly equal population so that every person’s vote carries the same weight in elections.
However, redistricting can be used politically—when one party controls the process, they may draw district lines to favor their own candidates, a tactic known as gerrymandering.
SNAP Cuts
The Impact of SNAP Cuts on Rural Families in Central Texas
Rural families in Central Texas are already facing significant economic pressures, and cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) would exacerbate food insecurity in these communities. SNAP, formerly known as food stamps, is a vital federal nutrition program that provides low-income families with the resources they need to purchase groceries and maintain a healthy diet. In rural areas like Bellville, Brenham, Sealy, and other parts of U.S. House District 10, families often live far from grocery stores and food retailers, making SNAP benefits even more critical. Reductions in these benefits could force families to choose between paying for food, rent, utilities, or medical care, amplifying the challenges of living in economically vulnerable rural communities.
For children in Central Texas, SNAP cuts would have a direct impact on nutrition and academic performance. Access to healthy meals is linked to better concentration, higher test scores, and improved overall well-being. When families lose SNAP support, children may go without adequate food, resulting in long-term developmental and educational consequences. Rural schools and community programs often rely on federal nutrition programs to supplement meals, and reductions in SNAP funding could strain these systems, leaving teachers and administrators scrambling to fill the gaps. Families already relying on free or reduced-price school meals would face increased pressure to cover food costs at home, further stretching limited household budgets.
Seniors and individuals with disabilities in rural Central Texas are also particularly vulnerable to SNAP cuts. Many older adults live on fixed incomes and rely on SNAP benefits to afford nutritious food that supports their health and independence. Reducing these benefits could lead to malnutrition, higher rates of chronic disease, and increased reliance on emergency food assistance from local food banks and charities. Rural health clinics, already underfunded and overextended, could see additional demand as nutrition-related health issues rise. Ensuring that SNAP benefits remain robust is essential to preventing preventable health crises and maintaining the overall well-being of Central Texas communities.
Local economies in Central Texas would also feel the impact of SNAP cuts. Every dollar of SNAP benefits is typically spent at grocery stores, farmers’ markets, and other food retailers, creating a ripple effect that supports jobs and economic activity. Reducing benefits would lower household spending on food, hurting small businesses and local suppliers that depend on consistent community demand. Rural towns, which often have fewer economic opportunities and rely heavily on local retail and agriculture, could experience a slowdown in commerce, compounding the economic challenges families already face.
Additionally, rural food systems in Central Texas are uniquely dependent on programs like SNAP to maintain stability. Many local farmers and food producers sell directly to residents or through partnerships with local markets and co-ops, which accept SNAP benefits. Cuts to the program could reduce demand for local produce and agricultural goods, undermining sustainability initiatives and harming the livelihoods of small farmers who are essential to the region’s economy and food security. By preserving SNAP funding, communities not only ensure access to nutrition for vulnerable families but also support local agriculture and economic resilience.
In conclusion, cuts to SNAP would have far-reaching consequences for rural families across Central Texas. From increased food insecurity among children, seniors, and low-income households, to strain on local schools, health systems, and businesses, the reduction of federal nutrition assistance would destabilize communities already facing economic challenges. Protecting SNAP benefits is not only a matter of compassion but also a critical investment in the health, education, and economic well-being of Central Texas. Federal leaders must recognize that SNAP is more than a safety net—it is a lifeline that sustains families, strengthens local economies, and ensures that rural communities continue to thrive.
USDA BUDGET CUTS
Loss of Climate-Smart Agriculture Grants
Central Texas farmers—many of whom were participating in USDA-backed sustainable agriculture programs—have lost access to millions in federal grant funding due to budget rollbacks. Notably, institutions like Texas A&M AgriLife and Prairie View A&M University, which serve as research and outreach hubs for Central Texas producers, were among those affected. These grants supported farmers implementing climate-smart practices like cover cropping, soil regeneration, carbon sequestration, and efficient water use.
Without this funding, many local farms are forced to delay or abandon sustainable transitions, making them more vulnerable to drought, rising input costs, and extreme weather—challenges that are increasingly common in the region.
Collapse of Local Food System Initiatives
Programs like the Local Food Purchase Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program (LFPA) and Local Food for Schools (LFS)—both of which connected Central Texas farmers with school districts, food banks, and nonprofits—have been defunded. This has disrupted farm-to-institution supply chains, causing farmers to lose reliable buyers for their produce and livestock.
As a result, producers report food going unsold or wasted, and communities that depended on these partnerships for fresh, local food—especially in rural and low-income areas—are now facing supply gaps.
Reduced Access to Technical Support & Outreach
Many Central Texas farmers, particularly new, minority, or veteran producers, depend on USDA-funded outreach, workshops, and technical assistance to navigate crop insurance, compliance, and sustainable practice adoption. With cuts to staffing and extension programs, these services have been scaled back or eliminated, leaving farmers without vital support.
This has made it harder for small and midsize farms to compete, qualify for other funding programs, or adapt to changing environmental and market conditions.
Strain on Rural Development & Infrastructure
Some USDA funding cuts have targeted rural development grants and loans, which help finance farm infrastructure like irrigation systems, barns, fencing, and high tunnels. Without access to these tools, farmers in Central Texas are struggling to modernize operations or expand production capacity, especially in counties that already face limited capital access from private lenders.
Disproportionate Impact on Underserved Farmers
Black, Latino, and immigrant farmers in Central Texas—many of whom were finally gaining ground through equity-focused USDA grants—have been especially hard hit. As federal support for DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) initiatives is scaled back, these farmers are losing access to credit-building programs, land retention resources, and culturally specific technical training. Many describe feeling abandoned midstream, with investments already made and no assistance to finish transitions or fulfill grant terms.
Summary
In short, USDA funding cuts have disrupted livelihoods, weakened local food networks, and increased vulnerability to climate and economic shocks in Central Texas. The most significant burdens fall on those least able to absorb the blow: small, sustainable, and historically underserved farms. Many are calling for urgent restoration of federal support, warning that without intervention, family farms across Central Texas may not survive the next few seasons.
— Dawn Marshall's campaign website (February 10, 2026)
Campaign finance summary
Note: The finance data shown here comes from the disclosures required of candidates and parties. Depending on the election or state, this may represent only a portion of all the funds spent on their behalf. Satellite spending groups may or may not have expended funds related to the candidate or politician on whose page you are reading this disclaimer. Campaign finance data from elections may be incomplete. For elections to federal offices, complete data can be found at the FEC website. Click here for more on federal campaign finance law and here for more on state campaign finance law.
See also
2026 Elections
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on February 19, 2026
