Deborah Jordahl
This article is outside of Ballotpedia's coverage scope and does not receive scheduled updates. If you would like to help our coverage scope grow, consider donating to Ballotpedia.
Deborah Jordahl | |
Basic facts | |
Role: | Principal of Johnson Jordahl |
Location: | Madison, Wis. |
Expertise: | Political consulting |
Affiliation: | Republican |
Website: | Official website |
Deborah Jordahl is a principal of Johnson Jordahl, a strategic communications and issue advocacy firm in Wisconsin.[1]
She served in an executive position under former Governor of Wisconsin Tommy Thompson's (R) administration. She also held positions in the Bush/Quayle campaign and Thompson's 1990 gubernatorial campaign. Her client list includes Governor Scott Walker (R) and Wisconsin Club for Growth (WCFG).[1]
The houses of Jordahl and fellow Johnson Jordahl Principal R.J. Johnson were searched by armed officers on October 3, 2013. The raids were connected to the John Doe investigations related to Scott Walker.[2][3]
John Doe investigations
Two John Doe investigations, beginning in 2010 and ending in 2015, were launched by Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm (D) into the activities of staff and associates of Gov. Scott Walker (R).[4] Because of her work with Wisconsin Club for Growth, Jordahl was one of the targets in the second of the John Does related to Scott Walker. In the early morning hours of October 3, 2013, officers and Milwaukee County DA investigators carried out raids on several homes located in the five counties.[5][6] On October 21, 2013, a second round of subpoenas went out for additional bank records.[7]
The Wall Street Journal detailed events surrounding the raid on Jordahl's home:[8]
“ | Deborah Jordahl [...] says that while her own home was being searched and her children were roused in the dark by law enforcement, prosecutors were searching her office without her knowledge. 'Earlier this year I learned . . . David Budde, the lead investigator for Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm, was searching our office in Madison. My partner and I were never notified of the search of our office,' Ms. Jordahl says, 'and the prosecutors never provided us with a copy of the warrant or an inventory of what was taken.' (Mr. Budde did not respond to a request for comment.)
Meantime, she says, 'my business partner and I had to figure out how to function without our equipment or records, and without the ability to disclose our situation to anyone. . . . You live under a cloud of suspicion.' Ms. Jordahl says prosecutors have deliberately misled the media about their involvement with the raids and how the search warrants were executed while denying her the right to call her attorney. '[Milwaukee District Attorney John] Chisholm denied any direct involvement in the raids through his attorney but his investigators led the searches at each site,' Ms. Jordahl says, adding that Special Prosecutor Schmitz 'lied when he said we were not told we could not call a lawyer.'[9] |
” |
—Wall Street Journal |
See also
- John Doe investigations related to Scott Walker
- Timeline of John Doe investigations related to Scott Walker
- Wisconsin John Doe laws
- Scott Walker
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Johnson Jordahl, "About," accessed May 27, 2015
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedUSDC05062014
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedWR05072014
- ↑ United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin Milwaukee Division, "Eric O’Keefe, and Wisconsin Club for Growth, Inc.," accessed February 23, 2015
- ↑ Wisconsin Reporter, "The day John Doe rushed through the door," October 3, 2014
- ↑ United States Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, "Eric O'Keefe et al v John Chisholm et al," September 2, 2014
- ↑ State of Wisconsin Circuit Court Waukesha County County, "Eric O'Keefe v Government Accountability Board," December 19, 2014
- ↑ Wall Street Journal, "The Wisconsin Targets Tell Their Story," July 22, 2015
- ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
|