Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Dorothea Batiste

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the official's last term in office covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Dorothea Batiste

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png


Prior offices
Alabama 10th Judicial Circuit

Education

Bachelor's

University of Alabama

Law

Birmingham School of Law

Dorothea Batiste is a former Republican Place 23 judge for Circuit 10 in Alabama. She was initially elected to the court in 2010. Batiste ran for re-election but lost in the general election on November 8, 2016.

Biography

Batiste received her undergraduate degree from the University of Alabama and her J.D. from the Birmingham School of Law. She was an attorney in private practice from 2003 to 2010.[1]

Elections

2016

See also: Alabama local trial court judicial elections, 2016

Alabama held general elections for local judicial offices in 2016. A primary election took place on March 1, 2016, with a primary runoff on April 12, 2016. The general election was held on November 8, 2016.

Agnes Chappell defeated incumbent Dorothea Batiste in the general election for the Alabama 10th Judicial Circuit Place 23 seat.[2]

Alabama 10th Judicial Circuit (Place 23), General Election, 2016
Party Candidate Vote % Votes
     Democratic Green check mark transparent.png Agnes Chappell 54.48% 155,008
     Republican Dorothea Batiste Incumbent 45.43% 129,261
Write-in votes 0.09% 266
Total Votes 284,535
Source: Alabama Votes, "2016 Unofficial General Election Results," accessed November 10, 2016

2010

See also: Alabama judicial elections, 2010

Batiste competed against Carnella Greene-Norman in the November 2 general election. Batiste won with 51.72 percent of the vote, compared to Carnella Greene-Norman's 48.28 percent.[3]

Noteworthy events

Batiste suspended with pay for alleged misconduct, counterclaims sexual harassment (2013)

In April 2013, Batiste was suspended with pay following a complaint by the Alabama Judicial Inquiry Commission. The commission alleged that Batiste unlawfully held parties in divorce cases in contempt of court. The judge denied the charges and accused former Presiding Judge Scott Vowell of creating false charges following a pattern of sexual harassment.[4]

Vowell said the canons of judicial ethics prevented him from commenting, but he was "confident that the outcome here will be the dismissal of these baseless charges."[5]

Vowell told the commission many lawyers were afraid their clients would "suffer retaliation if they file[d] charges against Judge Batiste." He added,

Judge Batiste has a pattern of poor case management, lack of control over her courtroom, using inappropriate language and conduct towards lawyers and the public, and generally engages in conduct which erodes the public's confidence in the judiciary.[6]

Batiste on trial in Court of the Judiciary

Batiste's trial in the Court of the Judiciary began on June 28, 2013. She faced more than 30 charges for alleged violations of the Alabama Canons of Judicial Ethics. In four of the five cases at issue in the complaint, contempt charges were filed against individuals appearing in Batiste's court for failing to appear in court pursuant to a subpoena or court order. The other contempt charge in the fifth case was for failure to appear in court and failing to pay court ordered child support payments.[7]

In its complaint, the commission alleged Batiste ". . .entered unauthorized, unwarranted, and unlawful orders for the arrest and jailing or incarceration of litigants or witnesses."[8] The complaint indicated that the judge overstepped her bounds by failing to follow proper procedures in contempt proceedings, and by jailing litigants without a prior hearing.

However, Batiste ". . .feels she is being targeted because of the fact she is a 'black female Republican'. . . I have known throughout all of this, people were going into conference rooms, meeting together after hearings, coming up with strategies. . .to remove me. . ."[9] Batiste claimed that Vowell only complained to the commission regarding the charges after she rejected his sexual advances. She also alleged that Vowell, a Democrat, referred to her as "the colored Republican".[7]

Vowell said that others informed him of the complaints, and that he tried to help Batiste address the criticisms. Since the original complaint was filed, Vowell retired from the bench. The commission said claims of sexual harassment would not be considered during the trial. According to the director of the judicial inquiry commission, the commission's goal was not to punish individual judges but to preserve the integrity of the state's judiciary.[9]

Batiste found guilty of judicial misconduct, suspended without pay for 90 days

The Alabama Court of the Judiciary issued a unanimous guilty decision on July 31, 2013. Batiste was suspended for 90 days without pay and ordered to attend formal training at the National Judicial College in September.[10]

Batiste had no comment regarding the decision. However, her attorneys said ". . .they were disappointed in the decision for what they said at most was simply a mistake." Julian McPhillips one of Batiste's attorneys said the decision was better than an offer of a suspension for ten months previously made by the Alabama Judicial Inquiry Commission.[10]

See also

External links

Footnotes