Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey
EDWARD JEROME HARBISON v. RICKY BELL, WARDEN (2009)

![]() |
EDWARD JEROME HARBISON v. RICKY BELL, WARDEN |
---|
Term: 2008 |
Important Dates |
Argued: January 12, 2009 |
Decided: April 1, 2009 |
Outcome |
Reversed |
Vote |
7-2 |
Majority |
Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Anthony Kennedy • David Souter • John Paul Stevens |
Concurring |
John Roberts • Clarence Thomas |
Dissenting |
Samuel Alito • Antonin Scalia |
EDWARD JEROME HARBISON v. RICKY BELL, WARDEN is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on April 1, 2009. The case was argued before the court on January 12, 2009.
In a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Tennessee Eastern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Federalism - federal pre-emption of state legislation or regulation. cf. state regulation of business. rarely involves union activity. Does not involve constitutional interpretation unless the Court says it does.
- Petitioner: Person convicted of crime
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: State
- Respondent state: Tennessee
- Citation: 556 U.S. 180
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
- Who wrote the majority opinion: John Paul Stevens
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes