Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.

EMPORIUM CAPWELL CO. v. WESTERN ADDITION COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION et al. (1975)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
EMPORIUM CAPWELL CO. v. WESTERN ADDITION COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION et al.
Term: 1974
Important Dates
Argued: October 22, 1974
Decided: February 18, 1975
Outcome
Reversed
Vote
8-1
Majority
Harry BlackmunWilliam BrennanWarren BurgerThurgood MarshallLewis PowellWilliam RehnquistPotter StewartByron White
Dissenting
William Douglas

EMPORIUM CAPWELL CO. v. WESTERN ADDITION COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 18, 1975. The case was argued before the court on October 22, 1974.

In an 8-1 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit (includes the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia but not the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which has local jurisdiction).

For a full list of cases decided in the 1970s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Burger Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Unions - Union-union member dispute (except as pertains to union or closed shop)
  • Petitioner: employer. If employer's relations with employees are governed by the nature of the employer's business (e.g., railroad, boat), rather than labor law generally, the more specific designation is used in place of Employer.
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Racial or ethnic minority employee or job applicant
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 420 U.S. 50
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Warren Burger
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Thurgood Marshall

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes