Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
ENTERPRISE IRRIGATION DISTRICT et al. v. FARMERS MUTUAL CANAL COMPANY et al. (1917)

![]() |
ENTERPRISE IRRIGATION DISTRICT et al. v. FARMERS MUTUAL CANAL COMPANY et al. |
---|
Term: 1916 |
Important Dates |
Argued: January 22, 1917 |
Decided: March 6, 1917 |
Outcome |
Petition denied or appeal dismissed |
Vote |
9-0 |
Majority |
Louis Dembitz Brandeis • John Hessin Clarke • William Rufus Day • Oliver Wendell Holmes • Joseph McKenna • James Clark McReynolds • Mahlon Pitney • Willis Van Devanter • Edward Douglass White |
ENTERPRISE IRRIGATION DISTRICT et al. v. FARMERS MUTUAL CANAL COMPANY et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 6, 1917. The case was argued before the court on January 22, 1917.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed the case. The case originated from the Nebraska State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1910s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the White Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Judicial Power - judicial administration: Supreme Court jurisdiction or authority on appeal or writ of error, from highest state court
- Petitioner: Business, corporation
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Business, corporation
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 243 U.S. 157
- How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Edward Douglass White
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Willis Van Devanter
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes