Know your vote. Take a look at your sample ballot now!

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. COMMERCIAL OFFICE PRODUCTS CO. (1988)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. COMMERCIAL OFFICE PRODUCTS CO.
Term: 1987
Important Dates
Argued: January 13, 1988
Decided: May 16, 1988
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
5-3
Majority
Harry BlackmunWilliam BrennanThurgood MarshallByron White
Concurring
Sandra Day O'Connor
Dissenting
William RehnquistAntonin ScaliaJohn Paul Stevens

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. COMMERCIAL OFFICE PRODUCTS CO. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 16, 1988. The case was argued before the court on January 13, 1988.

In a 5-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Colorado U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1980s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Civil Rights - employment discrimination: on basis of race, age, religion, illegitimacy, national origin, or working conditions.
  • Petitioner: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: employer. If employer's relations with employees are governed by the nature of the employer's business (e.g., railroad, boat), rather than labor law generally, the more specific designation is used in place of Employer.
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 486 U.S. 107
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Thurgood Marshall

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes