Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

ERNEST C. ROE, WARDEN v. LUCIO FLORES-ORTEGA (2000)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
ERNEST C. ROE, WARDEN v. LUCIO FLORES-ORTEGA
Term: 1999
Important Dates
Argued: November 1, 1999
Decided: February 23, 2000
Outcome
Vacated and remanded
Vote
6-3
Majority
Anthony KennedySandra Day O'ConnorWilliam RehnquistAntonin ScaliaClarence Thomas
Concurring
Stephen Breyer
Dissenting
Ruth Bader GinsburgDavid SouterJohn Paul Stevens

ERNEST C. ROE, WARDEN v. LUCIO FLORES-ORTEGA is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 23, 2000. The case was argued before the court on November 1, 1999.

In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the California Eastern U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Right to counsel (cf. indigents appointment of counsel or inadequate representation)
  • Petitioner: State
  • Petitioner state: California
  • Respondent type: Person convicted of crime
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 528 U.S. 470
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Sandra Day O'Connor

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes