Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA, et al. v. MCMILLAN et al. (1984)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA, et al. v. MCMILLAN et al.
Term: 1983
Important Dates
Argued: January 10, 1984
Decided: March 27, 1984
Outcome
Vacated and remanded
Vote
8-1
Majority
William BrennanWarren BurgerSandra Day O'ConnorLewis PowellWilliam RehnquistJohn Paul StevensByron White
Concurring
Harry Blackmun
Dissenting
Thurgood Marshall

ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA, et al. v. MCMILLAN et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 27, 1984. The case was argued before the court on January 10, 1984.

In an 8-1 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Florida Northern U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1980s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Burger Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Judicial Power - judicial administration: Supreme Court jurisdiction or authority on appeal or writ of error, from federal district courts or courts of appeals (cf. 753)
  • Petitioner: County government or county governmental unit, except school district
  • Petitioner state: Florida
  • Respondent type: voter, prospective voter, elector, or a nonelective official seeking reapportionment or redistricting of legislative districts (POL)
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 466 U.S. 48
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Appeal
  • What type of decision was made: Per curiam (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Warren Burger
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Unknown

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes