Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Eleventh Circuit |
---|
Court of Appeals |
![]() |
Judgeships |
Posts: 12 |
Judges: 12 |
Vacancies: 0 |
Judges |
Chief: William Pryor |
Active judges: Nancy Gbana Abudu, Elizabeth L. Branch, Andrew Brasher, Britt Grant, Adalberto Jordan, Embry Kidd, Barbara Lagoa, Robert J. Luck, Kevin C. Newsom, Jill Pryor, William Pryor, Robin Rosenbaum Senior judges: |
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is a federal appellate court with appellate jurisdiction. It hears appeals from all of the circuit courts within its jurisdiction and its rulings may be appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States. Appeals are heard in the Elbert P. Tuttle U.S. Court of Appeals Building in Atlanta.
This page contains the following information on the Eleventh Circuit.
- An overview of the court's jurisdiction
- A list of the court's active and senior judges
- A list of the court's current vacancies
- A brief history of the court
- Case reversal statistics by the Supreme Court of the United States
- Noteworthy cases heard by the court
- A list of the court's former judges
- Information about U.S. Courts of Appeals
- Where the court is located
Vacancies
- See also: Current federal judicial vacancies
There are no current vacancies on the 11th Circuit, out of the court's 12 judicial positions.
Pending nominations
There are no pending nominees for this court.
Active judges
Article III judges
Judge | Appointed By | Assumed Office | Bachelors | Law |
---|---|---|---|---|
June 10, 2005 - |
Northeast Louisiana University, 1984 |
Tulane University Law School, 1987 |
||
February 17, 2012 - |
University of Miami, 1984 |
University of Miami School of Law, 1987 |
||
June 2, 2014 - |
Cornell University, 1988 |
University of Miami School of Law, 1991 |
||
September 9, 2014 - |
College of William & Mary, 1985 |
Yale Law School, 1988 |
||
August 2, 2017 - |
Samford University, 1994 |
Harvard Law School, 1997 |
||
March 19, 2018 - |
Davidson College, 1990 |
Emory University School of Law, 1994 |
||
August 3, 2018 - |
Wake Forest University, 2000 |
Stanford Law School, 2007 |
||
November 19, 2019 - |
University of Florida, 2000 |
University of Florida College of Law, 2004 |
||
December 6, 2019 - |
Florida International University, 1989 |
Columbia University, 1992 |
||
June 30, 2020 - |
Samford University, 2002 |
Harvard Law School, 2006 |
||
May 26, 2023 - |
Columbia University, 1996 |
Tulane University School of Law, 1999 |
||
January 2, 2025 - |
Emory University, 2005 |
Yale University, 2008 |
Active Article III judges by appointing political party
Below is a display of the number of active judges by the party of the appointing president. It does not reflect how a judge may rule on specific cases or their own political preferences.
- Democratic appointed: 5
- Republican appointed: 7
Senior judges
Senior status is a classification for federal judges at all levels who are semi-retired. Senior judges are Article III judges who, having met eligibility through age and service requirements, continue to serve on federal courts while typically hearing a reduced number of cases. Some senior judges, however, elect to retain a full caseload after taking senior status. According to the Administrative Office of U.S. Courts, senior judges "typically handle about 15 percent of the federal courts' workload annually."[1] The date listed under assumed office in the table below reflects the date that the judge took senior status.
Judge | Appointed By | Assumed Office | Bachelors | Law |
---|---|---|---|---|
January 31, 2009 - |
Yale College, 1958 |
Harvard Law School, 1961 |
||
February 25, 2011 - |
Florida State University, 1964 |
University of Florida College of Law, 1967 |
||
July 15, 2012 - |
Emory University, 1968 |
University of Georgia School of Law, 1971 |
||
October 26, 2013 - |
University of Alabama, 1970 |
Samford University, Cumberland School of Law, 1973 |
||
December 31, 2017 - |
Randolph-Macon Woman's College, 1970 |
Emory University School of Law, 1973 |
||
June 18, 2018 - |
University of Georgia, 1972 |
University of Georgia School of Law, 1975 |
||
None (reassignment) |
November 19, 2019 - |
Duke University School of Law, 1957 |
||
November 20, 2019 - |
City University of New York, Queens College, 1967 |
Harvard Law School, 1971 |
||
June 30, 2020 - |
University of Alabama, 1972 |
Harvard Law School, 1975 |
||
January 2, 2025 - |
University of Notre Dame, 1976 |
Notre Dame Law School, 1979 |
Senior judges by appointing political party
Below is a display of the number of senior judges by the party of the appointing president. It does not reflect how a judge may rule on specific cases or their own political preferences.
- Democratic appointed: 6
- Republican appointed: 6
Former chief judges
In order to qualify for the office of chief judge in an Article III circuit or district court, or on the United States Court of International Trade, a judge must be in active service and hold seniority over the court's commissioned judges who are 64 years of age or under, have served one year or more, and have not previously served as chief judge.[2]
In the event that no judge on the court meets those qualifications, the youngest judge in regular active service aged 65 years or more and who has served as a judge for one year or more shall become chief judge. If no judge meets those qualifications, the judge holding seniority in active service who has not served as chief before shall become the chief judge.[3][4][5]
The chief judge serves for a term of seven years until another judge becomes eligible to serve in the position. No judge is permitted to serve as chief judge after reaching the age of 70 years unless no other judge is qualified to serve.[3][4][5]
Unlike the chief justice of the United States, a chief judge returns to active service after the expiration of their term and does not create a vacancy on the court by the fact of their promotion.[2][3][4][5]
On the United States Court of Federal Claims, the chief judge is selected by the president of the United States. The judge must be less than 70 years of age. A chief may serve until they reach age 70 or until another judge is designated by the president as the new chief judge. If the president selects a new chief judge, the former chief judge may continue active service on the court for the remainder of their appointed term.[6]
- Ed Carnes - (2013-2020)
- Joel Dubina - (2009-2013)
- James L. Edmondson - (2002 - 2009)
- Robert Lanier Anderson - (1999-2002)
- Joseph Hatchett - (1996-1999)
- Gerald Tjoflat - (1989-1996)
- Paul Roney - (1986-1989)
- John Godbold - (1981-1986)
Former judges
For more information on judges of the Eleventh Circuit, see former federal judges of the Eleventh Circuit.
Jurisdiction
The Eleventh Circuit has appellate jurisdiction over cases heard in one of its subsidiary districts. These cases can include civil and criminal matters that fall under federal law. Appeals of rulings by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals are petitioned to the Supreme Court of the United States. Justice Clarence Thomas is the circuit justice for the Eleventh Circuit.
The United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit has appellate jurisdiction over the district courts in the following districts:
Caseloads
This section contains court management statistics dating back to 2010. It was last updated in September 2024. Click [show] below for more information on caseload terms and definitions.
Caseload statistics explanation | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Term | Explanation | ||||||||
Cases filed and terminated | The number of civil and criminal lawsuits formally initiated or decided by the court in a calendar year. The chart below reflects the table columns Cases filed and Cases terminated. | ||||||||
Average time from filing to disposition | The average amount of time, in months, from a case's date of filing to date of disposition (acquittal, sentencing, dismissal, etc.). The chart below reflects the table columns Median time (Criminal) and Median time (Civil). | ||||||||
Starting case load | The number of cases pending from the previous calendar year. | ||||||||
Cases filed | The number of civil and criminal lawsuits formally initiated in a calendar year. | ||||||||
Cases terminated | The total number of civil and criminal lawsuits decided by the court in a calendar year. | ||||||||
Remaining cases | The number of civil and criminal cases pending at the end of a given year. | ||||||||
Median time (Criminal) | The average amount of time, in months, from a case's date of filing to the date of disposition. In criminal cases, the date of disposition occurs on the day of sentencing or acquittal/dismissal. | ||||||||
Median time (Civil) | The average amount of time, in months, from a case's date of filing to the date of disposition. | ||||||||
Three-year civil cases | The number and percent of civil cases that were filed more than three years before the end of the given calendar year. | ||||||||
Vacant posts | The number of months during the year an authorized judgeship was vacant. | ||||||||
Trial/Post | The number of trials completed divided by the number of authorized judgeships on the court. Trials include evidentiary trials, hearings on temporary restraining orders, and preliminary injunctions. | ||||||||
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit caseload stats, 2010-2023 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | Appeals Filed | Appeals Terminated | Pending Appeals | Terminations on the Merits (per Active Judge) | Procedural Terminations (per Active Judge) | Total Written Decisions (per Active Judge) | Number of Judgeships | Number of Sitting Senior Judges | Number of Vacant Judgeship Months | Median Time From Filing Notice of Appeal to Disposition | |
2010 | 6,296 | 6,362 | 3,565 | 664 | 250 | 213 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 9 | |
2011 | 6,449 | 6,303 | 3,683 | 722 | 287 | 246 | 12 | 6 | 5 | 8 | |
2012 | 6,912 | 6,686 | 3,894 | 763 | 214 | 291 | 12 | 7 | 19 | 7 | |
2013 | 6,254 | 6,505 | 3,638 | 913 | 243 | 325 | 12 | 8 | 29 | 8 | |
2014 | 6,087 | 6,239 | 3,511 | 936 | 220 | 356 | 12 | 8 | 31 | 7 | |
2015 | 6,127 | 6,066 | 3,548 | 732 | 185 | 271 | 12 | 7 | 12 | 7 | |
2016 | 8,038 | 7,553 | 4,042 | 1,151 | 223 | 393 | 12 | 5 | 12 | 4 | |
2017 | 6,073 | 6,391 | 3,725 | 764 | 167 | 294 | 12 | 5 | 12 | 8 | |
2018 | 5,718 | 5,888 | 3,569 | 626 | 116 | 240 | 12 | 5 | 15 | 8 | |
2019 | 5,507 | 5,672 | 3,412 | 601 | 113 | 219 | 12 | 9 | 12 | 8 | |
2020 | 5,161 | 5,316 | 3,260 | 566 | 98 | 190 | 12 | 10 | 0 | 8 | |
2021 | 4,733 | 4,754 | 3,247 | 558 | 95 | 182 | 12 | 11 | 3 | 9 | |
2022 | 4,583 | 4,634 | 3,205 | 539 | 95 | 171 | 12 | 10 | 3 | 10 | |
2023 | 4,265 | 4,331 | 3,172 | 512 | 51 | 163 | 12 | 10 | 5 | 10 | |
Average | 5,872 | 5,907 | 3,534 | 718 | 168 | 254 | 12 | 8 | 12 | 8 |
History
Court history
The Eleventh Circuit was established on October 14, 1980, under 94 Stat. 1994 which broke the then Fifth Circuit up into the Fifth Circuit and the Eleventh Circuit. All of the judges who resided in the newly created Eleventh Circuit were transferred to the new appellate court. The court has had twelve judicial posts since its creation.[7]
The districts within the Eleventh Circuit were originally part of the United States Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit. The Eleventh Circuit Act of 1980 was enacted by Congress and effective as of October 1, 1981. For this reason, Fifth Circuit decisions from before this split are considered binding precedent in the Eleventh Circuit.
Judicial posts
The following table highlights the development of judicial posts for the Eleventh Circuit:[8]
Year | Statute | Total Seats |
October 14, 1980 | 94 Stat. 1994 | 12 |
Reversal rate
Since 2007, SCOTUS has released opinions in 1,313 cases. Of those, it reversed a lower court decision 938 times (71.4 percent) while affirming a lower court decision 363 times (27.6 percent).
In that time period, SCOTUS has decided 82 cases originating from the Eleventh Circuit, affirming in 29 cases and reversing in 53 cases, for a reversal rate of 65 percent. As of the end of the 2023 term, of the Article III circuits—the ordinal circuits, the D.C. Circuit, and the Federal Circuit—the court with the lowest rate of overturned decisions is the Fourth Circuit at 62.1 percent.
Noteworthy cases
The following are noteworthy cases heard before this court. To suggest cases we should cover here, email us. To read opinions published by this court, click here.
• Eleventh Circuit holds that Alabama’s low property tax does not discriminate against poor and minority students (2014) | Click for summary→ |
---|---|
Students in two poor Alabama counties filed suit against the state, claiming that the low amount of property taxes collected in the state discriminates against poor and minority students. Portions of Alabama’s tax code cap the amount of property tax that can be collected and what types of property fall under that provision of the code. The students argued that the laws were meant to keep rural school districts, which are comprised of mostly black students, from raising funds.
United States District Judge Lynwood Smith previously dismissed the students’ case. In his lengthy order dismissing the case, Judge Smith said while that sections of the laws to which the students objected were enacted for a racially motivated reason, the laws did not disparately impact students across the state. As a result, he could not find the laws unconstitutional. The Eleventh Circuit’s three-judge panel, consisting of Judges Adalberto Jordan, Robert Lanier Anderson and Brock Hornby (sitting by designation), agreed with Judge Smith. Judge Jordan wrote for the panel. In his opinion, he said that the students lacked standing to bring a challenge to mileage-cap provisions, which the students said is a bar to raising property tax rates. Further, he indicated that Judge Smith did not err in finding that the property classification system was not devised with any racial malice in mind. Judge Jordan also pointed out that voters in both counties in which the students reside voted against raising property tax rates. Neither county collects at the maximum allowed rate. Alabama’s property tax rate is $539 per capita, which is the lowest in the nation. Articles: |
• Federal injunction against immigration law (2011) Judge(s):Rosemary Barkett, Edward Carnes and Frank Hull ((dead link) USA v. State of Alabama, No. 11-14532) | Click for summary→ |
---|---|
On October 14, 2011, the Eleventh Circuit ruled on a federal injunction filed against an Alabama immigration law passed in June 2011. The court's ruling did not block all sections of the law, but did add additional blocks to those put in place by U.S. District Judge Sharon Blackburn's ruling in September 2011. Among the sections of the law that were temporarily blocked by the circuit court was one requiring public schools to check the immigration status of all enrolled students, and another making it a misdemeanor for immigrants to fail to carry registration on their person. However, the court allowed the state to enforce some key points of the law, including one that required police to try to determine the immigration status of an individual during lawful stops and arrests, one that invalidated contracts involving immigrants living in the country illegally, and one making it a felony crime for immigrants living in the country illegally to enter into a business transaction in the state of Alabama.[9] The full story can be found here. Parts of the law blocked by Judge Blackburn's ruling included:
Parts of the law blocked by this Eleventh Circuit decision included:
UpdateIn October 2013, the State of Alabama reached a settlement with the American Civil Liberties Union, one of the major challengers of the immigration law. The settlement ended the federal lawsuit and parts of the law voided by the Eleventh Circuit, including the requirement that schools check student citizenship and police detain individuals who could not prove citizenship during stops. It also required the state to pay attorney fees and expenses for bringing the suit.[12] | |
Before the U.S. Supreme Court
This section focuses on cases the U.S. Supreme Court heard that originated in this court. To suggest cases we should cover here, email us.
2025-2026 term
The following case was scheduled for argument before the U.S. Supreme Court during the 2025-2026 term.
2025-2026 U.S. Supreme Court cases from the 11th Circuit | |||
---|---|---|---|
Case | Opinion author | Decision | Vote |
Bowe v. United States | TBA | TBA | TBA |
Hamm v. Smith (2025) | TBA | TBA | TBA |
2024-2025 term
The following case was heard by the U.S. Supreme Court during the 2024-2025 term.
2024-2025 U.S. Supreme Court cases from the 11th Circuit | |||
---|---|---|---|
Case | Opinion author | Decision | Vote |
Bouarfa v. Mayorkas | Ketanji Brown Jackson | affirmed | 9-0 |
Stanley v. City of Sanford, Florida | TBD | TBD | TBD |
Hamm v. Smith | Per curiam (decided without argument) | vacated and remanded | 7-2 |
Martin v. United States | Neil Gorsuch | vacated and remanded | 9-0 |
2023-2024 term
The following cases were heard by the U.S. Supreme Court during the 2023-2024 term.
2023-2024 U.S. Supreme Court cases from the 11th Circuit | |||
---|---|---|---|
Case | Opinion author | Decision | Vote |
Culley v. Marshall | Brett Kavanaugh | affirmed | 6-3 |
Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. Nealy | Elena Kagan | affirmed | 6-3 |
Moody v. NetChoice, LLC | Elena Kagan | vacated and remanded | 9-0 |
2022-2023 term
The following cases were heard by the U.S. Supreme Court during the 2022-2023 term.
2022-2023 U.S. Supreme Court cases from the 11th Circuit | |||
---|---|---|---|
Case | Opinion author | Decision | Vote |
Smith v. United States | Samuel Alito | affirmed | 9-0 |
2021-2022 term
The following cases were heard before the U.S. Supreme Court during the 2021-2022 term.
2021-2022 U.S. Supreme Court cases from the 11th Circuit | |||
---|---|---|---|
Case | Opinion author | Decision | Vote |
Patel v. Garland | Amy Coney Barrett | affirmed | 5-4 |
Gallardo v. Marstiller | Clarence Thomas | affirmed | 7-2 |
Ruan v. United States (Consolidated with Kahn v. United States) | Stephen Breyer | vacated and remanded | 9-0 |
Kemp v. United States | Clarence Thomas | affirmed | 8-1 |
Nance v. Ward | Elena Kagan | reversed and remanded | 5-4 |
2020-2021 term
The following cases were scheduled for argument before the U.S. Supreme Court during the 2020-2021 term.
2020-2021 U.S. Supreme Court cases from the 11th Circuit | |||
---|---|---|---|
Case | Opinion author | Decision | Vote |
Van Buren v. United States | Amy Coney Barrett | reversed and remanded | 6-3 |
Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski | Clarence Thomas | reversed and remanded | 8-1 |
Greer v. United States | Brett Kavanaugh | affirmed | 9-0 |
Terry v. United States | Clarence Thomas | affirmed | 9-0 |
Dunn v. Reeves (Decided without argument) | Per curiam | reversed and remanded | 6-3 |
2019-2020 term
The following cases were heard before the U.S. Supreme Court during the 2019-2020 term.
2019-2020 U.S. Supreme Court cases from the 11th Circuit | |||
---|---|---|---|
Case | Opinion author | Decision | Vote |
Shular v. United States | Ruth Bader Ginsburg | affirmed | 9-0 |
Babb v. Wilkie | Samuel Alito | reversed and remanded | 8-1 |
Barton v. Barr | Brett Kavanaugh | affirmed | 5-4 |
Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org Inc. | John Roberts | affirmed | 5-4 |
Nasrallah v. Barr | Brett Kavanaugh | reversed | 7-2 |
GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v. Outokumpu Stainless USA LLC | Clarence Thomas | reversed and remanded | 9-0 |
Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia (Consolidated with Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda and R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes v. EEOC) | Neil Gorsuch | reversed and remanded | 6-3 |
Federal courthouse
The Eleventh Circuit is located at the Elbert P. Tuttle U.S. Court of Appeals Building in Atlanta, Georgia. Ground was broken for the courthouse in 1907, and it was constructed to accommodate the federal services needed for the growing Atlanta population. The building was designed by Architect James Knox Taylor of the U.S. Treasury Department. The court occupied the building in 1981. The courthouse was added to the National Register of Historic Places in 1974.[13]
About United States Court of Appeals
The United States courts of appeals (or circuit courts) are the intermediate appellate courts of the United States federal courts. The court of appeals was originally created in 1891 and has grown to include thirteen courts.
A court of appeals decides appeals from any of the district courts that are in its federal judicial circuit. The appeals courts also can hear appeals from some administrative agencies. Decisions of the federal appeals courts can, in turn, be appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States.
There are thirteen United States courts of appeals. In addition, there are other federal courts (such as the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, which hears appeals in court-martial cases) that have "Court of Appeals" in their titles.
The eleven numbered circuits and the D.C. Circuit are defined by geography. The thirteenth court of appeal is the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. This court has nationwide jurisdiction over certain types of appeals based on what the underlying legal case is about.
All of the courts of appeals also hear appeals from some administrative agency decisions and rulemaking. The largest share of this type of case is heard by the D.C. Circuit. The Federal Circuit hears appeals from specialized trial courts, primarily the Court of International Trade and the Court of Federal Claims, as well as appeals from the district courts in patent cases and certain other specialized matters.
Federal circuit court judges are appointed for life. They are paid approximately $179,500 annually. At the age of 65, a federal judge may choose to retire with his or her full salary. Judges may also choose to go on senior status at age 65, if they have served actively for 15 years.[14]
Appointments by president
The chart below shows the number of appeals court judges confirmed by the U.S. Senate through September 1 of the first year of each president's second term in office. At this point in the term, Presidents Obama had the most appeals court appointments with 8.
Judges by circuit
- See also: Judicial vacancies in federal courts
The table below displays the number of judges in each circuit and indicates how many were appointed by presidents from each major political party. It also includes the number of vacancies on a circuit and how many pending nominations for that circuit are before the United States Senate. The table can be sorted by clicking the column headers above the line. It is updated every Monday.
See also
- Middle District of Alabama
- Northern District of Alabama
- Southern District of Alabama
- Middle District of Florida
- Northern District of Florida
- Southern District of Florida
- Middle District of Georgia
- Northern District of Georgia
- Southern District of Georgia
External links
- Search Google News for this topic
- United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit
- Judges of the Eleventh Circuit
- Comprehensive Opinions Database of the Eleventh Circuit
- Federal Judicial Center, "U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit," August 9, 2019
- Elbert P. Tuttle U.S. Court of Appeals Building, Atlanta, GA
- Eleventh Circuit blog
Footnotes
- ↑ United States Courts, "FAQs: Federal Judges: What is a senior judge?" accessed December 19, 2016
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 United States Courts, "Frequently Asked Questions," accessed January 25, 2022
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute, "28 U.S. Code § 136 - Chief judges; precedence of district judges," accessed January 25, 2022
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute, "28 U.S. Code § 258 - Chief judges; precedence of judges," accessed January 25, 2022
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute, "28 U.S. Code § 45 - Chief judges; precedence of judges," accessed January 25, 2022
- ↑ Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute, "28 U.S. Code § 171 - Appointment and number of judges; character of court; designation of chief judge," accessed January 25, 2022
- ↑ Federal Judicial Center, "History of the Eleventh Circuit," accessed May 11, 2021
- ↑ Federal Judicial Center, "History of the Eleventh Circuit," accessed May 11, 2021
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 CNN, "Parts of Alabama immigration law blocked by federal appeals court," October 14, 2011
- ↑ Politico, "Judge OKs key parts of Alabama immigration law," September 28, 2011
- ↑ International Business Times, "Alabama Immigration Law Challenged Again: U.S. Government Seeks Injunction," October 9, 2011
- ↑ U.S. News and World Report, "Settlement ends suits over Ala immigration law," October 29, 2013
- ↑ U.S. General Services Administration, "Elbert P. Tuttle U.S. Court of Appeals Building Overview," accessed January 29, 2014
- ↑ United States Courts, "FAQs: Federal Judges," accessed May 5, 2021
| |||
---|---|---|---|
Active judges |
Chief Judge: William Pryor • Adalberto Jordan • Barbara Lagoa • Robin Rosenbaum • Jill Pryor • Elizabeth Branch • Robert J. Luck • Britt Grant • Kevin Newsom • Andrew Brasher • Embry Kidd • Nancy Gbana Abudu | ||
Senior judges |
Stanley Marcus • Julie Carnes • Robert Lanier Anderson • Gerald Tjoflat • James Edmondson (Federal judge) • Joel Dubina • Susan Black (Eleventh Circuit) • Frank Hull • Charles Wilson (Florida) • Edward Carnes • | ||
Former judges | Beverly Martin • Peter Fay • John Godbold • Phyllis Kravitch • Joseph Hatchett • Albert Henderson • Paul Roney • David Dyer • Elbert Tuttle • Thomas Clark (Eleventh Circuit) • Richard Rives • Robert Vance • Lewis Morgan • Emmett Cox • Stanley Birch • Rosemary Barkett • James Hill (Federal judge) • Warren Leroy Jones • John Bryan Simpson • Frank M. Johnson, Jr. • | ||
Former Chief judges |
John Godbold • Robert Lanier Anderson • Gerald Tjoflat • Joseph Hatchett • James Edmondson (Federal judge) • Paul Roney • Joel Dubina • Edward Carnes • |