Evaluation of South Carolina city websites

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Municipal Government Final.jpg

This municipal government-related article was part of the Sunshine Review website. Ballotpedia archived this article to preserve its historical content.


Below is a chart evaluating the transparency efforts of South Carolina city websites.

Reading the chart

In the chart below:

600px-Yes check.png means that information is included on the government website
600px-Red x.png means that the information was not provided on the government website
PPartial.png means that information was partially provided

Check the page about each city for more detailed information about what information is available on the city website, along with recommendations users have made for positive changes.

Conclusions chart

2012

This chart encompasses the 5 largest cities in South Carolina: Columbia, Charleston, North Charleston, Rock Hill, and Mount Pleasant. These cities averaged a "B" website transparency grade in June of 2012.

Budget? Meetings? Elected officials? Admin. Officials? Permits/
Zoning?
Audits? Contracts? Lobbying? Public records? Taxes?
Y
600px-Yes check.png
3 4 4 4 5 5 2 2 3 3
PPartial.png 2 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 2
N
600px-Red x.png
0 0 0 1 0 0 1 3 1 0

Comparison chart

South Carolina City Website Evaluations (Performed 2009-2012)
County Grades Budget Meetings Elected Officials Admin. Officials Permits/Zoning Audits Contracts Lobbying Public records Taxes
Aiken, South Carolina C Y
600px-Yes check.png
Y
600px-Yes check.png
PPartial.png PPartial.png Y
600px-Yes check.png
Y
600px-Yes check.png
PPartial.png N
600px-Red x.png
N
600px-Red x.png
Y
600px-Yes check.png

Correcting errors

If you discover an error in this chart or on one of the articles about a South Carolina city, you can report the error by emailing us.