Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
Ex parte MARTHA BRADSTREET, IN THE MATTER OF MARTHA BRADSTREET, DEMANDANT (1833)

![]() |
ex parte MARTHA BRADSTREET, IN THE MATTER OF MARTHA BRADSTREET, DEMANDANT |
---|
Term: 1833 |
Important Dates |
Decided: March 13, 1833 |
Outcome |
Stay, petition, or motion granted |
Vote |
6-0 |
Majority |
Gabriel Duvall • William Johnson Jr. • John Marshall • John McLean • Joseph Story • Smith Thompson |
ex parte MARTHA BRADSTREET, IN THE MATTER OF MARTHA BRADSTREET, DEMANDANT is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 13, 1833.
In a 6-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court granted the petition, stay, or motion. The case originated from the New York Northern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1830s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Marshall Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Judicial Power - judicial administration: Supreme Court jurisdiction or authority on appeal or writ of error, from federal district courts or courts of appeals (cf. 753)
- Petitioner: Injured person or legal entity, nonphysically and non-employment related
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Judge
- Respondent state: United States
- Citation: 32 U.S. 634
- How the court took jurisdiction: Mandamus
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: John Marshall
- Who wrote the majority opinion: John Marshall
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes