Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

Ex parte ROE (1914)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
ex parte ROE
Term: 1913
Important Dates
Argued: April 6, 1914
Decided: May 25, 1914
Outcome
Petition denied or appeal dismissed
Vote
9-0
Majority
William Rufus Day • Oliver Wendell Holmes • Charles Evans Hughes • Joseph Rucker Lamar • Horace Harmon Lurton • Joseph McKenna • Mahlon Pitney • Willis Van Devanter • Edward Douglass White

ex parte ROE is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 25, 1914. The case was argued before the court on April 6, 1914.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed the case. The case originated from the Texas Eastern U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1910s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the White Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Judicial Power - judicial administration: extraordinary relief (e.g., mandamus, injunction)
  • Petitioner: Employee, or job applicant, including beneficiaries of
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Judge
  • Respondent state: United States
  • Citation: 234 U.S. 70
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Mandamus
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Edward Douglass White
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Willis Van Devanter

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. ↑ Harold J. Spaeth, Lee Epstein, et al., "2023 Supreme Court Database, Version 2023 Release 1 and SCDB Legacy 07," accessed March 21, 2024
Retrieved from "https://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php?title=Ex_parte_ROE_(1914)&oldid=9490955"