Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
Ex parte WALL (1883)

![]() |
ex parte WALL |
---|
Term: 1882 |
Important Dates |
Argued: January 3, 1883 |
Decided: April 16, 1883 |
Outcome |
Petition denied or appeal dismissed |
Vote |
8-1 |
Majority |
Samuel Blatchford • Joseph Bradley • Horace Gray • John Marshall Harlan • Stanley Matthews • Samuel Freeman Miller • Morrison Waite • William Burnham Woods |
Dissenting |
Stephen Johnson Field |
ex parte WALL is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on April 16, 1883. The case was argued before the court on January 3, 1883.
In an 8-1 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed the case. The case originated from the Florida Southern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1880s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Waite Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Attorneys - Admission to a state or federal bar, disbarment, and attorney discipline (cf. loyalty oath: bar applicants)
- Petitioner: Attorney, or person acting as such;includes bar applicant or law student, or law firm or bar association
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Judge
- Respondent state: United States
- Citation: 107 U.S. 265
- How the court took jurisdiction: Mandamus
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Morrison Waite
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Joseph Bradley
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes