Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Executive control of agencies: A 50-state survey (2020)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
New Administrative State Banner.png
This survey is part of a series of 50-state surveys examining the five pillars key to understanding the administrative state
Administrative State
Administrative State Icon Gold.png
Five Pillars of the Administrative State
Agency control
Executive control
Judicial control
Legislative control
Public Control

Click here for more coverage of the administrative state on Ballotpedia.
Click here to access Ballotpedia's administrative state legislation tracker.


Disclaimer: The research presented on this page was completed in 2020. It has not been regularly updated since its completion. This page is likely outdated and may be incomplete.


BP-Initials-UPDATED.png This Ballotpedia article is in need of updates. Please email us if you would like to suggest a revision. If you would like to help our coverage grow, consider donating to Ballotpedia.


This page compares results from a series of Ballotpedia surveys about executive control of agencies, one of the five pillars key to understanding the main areas of debate about the nature and scope of the administrative state. Ballotpedia reviewed all 50 state constitutions and administrative procedures acts (APAs) to see how each state approached executive control of agencies as of 2020.

This article shows how state approaches to executive control of agencies compared with one another based on the following questions:

For each survey question, Ballotpedia labeled a state as yes or no based on whether the state gave more or less power to its administrative state.

You can find the results of other Ballotpedia surveys here.

This page features the following sections:

In 2025, Ballotpedia updated the pillar system used to understand the main areas of debate about the nature and scope of the administrative state. Click here to learn more about this updated structure and to see Ballotpedia's current content related to the administrative state.



Methodology

Ballotpedia examined all 50 state constitutions and Administrative Procedure Acts (APAs) to see how states approached executive control of agencies in their foundational laws as of 2020. Administrative Procedure Acts (APAs) govern the procedures state administrative agencies must follow to issue regulations and adjudicate disputes. The particular procedures outlined in each APA vary among the 50 states.

For each survey question, Ballotpedia labeled a state as yes or no based on whether the state gave more or less power to its administrative state.

Other state laws that might have addressed how a state approached executive control of agencies are beyond the scope of this survey.

To see the specific legal provisions Ballotpedia used to categorize each state, click here.

Summary of key findings

Ballotpedia's survey of state constitutions and APAs produced the following key takeaways (as of November 2020):

  • Five states had yeses for every executive control question. That means that executives seemed to have more control of administrative agencies in those states than in others.
Those states are: Florida, Georgia, Minnesota, Oregon, and South Carolina
  • All 50 states had at least one yes for executive control questions.

Table showing how states approached executive control of agencies

The table below includes each state in alphabetical order and indicates how specific provisions in their constitutions or APAs addressed executive control of agencies. Ballotpedia evaluated each state according to the following questions:

  • Does the state APA or constitution grant state executive removal power over administrative agency officials?
  • Does the state APA or constitution establish elected cabinet members?
  • Does the state APA or constitution establish with clarity how administrative law judges are chosen?
  • Does the state APA or constitution indicate whether administrative law judges are accountable to a chief ALJ?

For the answers:

  • Yes means that the state's APA or constitution limited the power of the administrative state
  • No means that the state APA or constitution expanded or did not limit the power of the administrative state
  • The numbers at the right side of the table indicate how many yeses and nos each state had

Other state laws that might have addressed how a state approached executive control of agencies are beyond the scope of this survey.

State Removal power Elected cabinet ALJ selection ALJ hierarchy Yeses Nos
Alabama No Yes No No 1 3
Alaska Yes No No No 1 3
Arizona No Yes No Yes 2 2
Arkansas Yes Yes No No 2 2
California No Yes Yes Yes 3 1
Colorado Yes Yes No No 2 2
Connecticut No Yes No No 1 3
Delaware Yes Yes No No 2 2
Florida Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 0
Georgia Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 0
Hawaii Yes No No No 1 3
Idaho No Yes No No 1 3
Illinois Yes Yes No No 2 2
Indiana No Yes No No 1 3
Iowa No Yes No No 1 3
Kansas No Yes Yes No 2 2
Kentucky No Yes Yes No 2 2
Louisiana Yes Yes Yes No 3 1
Maine Yes Yes Yes No 3 1
Maryland Yes Yes No No 2 2
Massachusetts No Yes No No 1 3
Michigan Yes Yes No No 2 2
Minnesota Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 0
Mississippi No Yes No No 1 3
Missouri Yes Yes No No 2 2
Montana Yes Yes Yes No 3 1
Nebraska Yes Yes No No 2 2
Nevada No Yes No No 1 3
New Hampshire Yes Yes No No 2 2
New Jersey Yes No No Yes 2 2
New Mexico Yes Yes No No 2 2
New York Yes Yes Yes No 3 1
North Carolina No Yes Yes Yes 3 1
North Dakota No Yes Yes No 2 2
Ohio No Yes Yes No 2 2
Oklahoma Yes Yes Yes No 3 1
Oregon Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 0
Pennsylvania Yes Yes Yes No 3 1
Rhode Island No Yes No No 1 3
South Carolina Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 0
South Dakota Yes Yes No No 2 2
Tennessee No No Yes No 1 3
Texas Yes Yes No No 2 2
Utah No Yes No No 1 3
Vermont No Yes No No 1 3
Virginia Yes Yes No No 2 2
Washington No Yes No No 1 3
West Virginia Yes Yes No No 2 2
Wisconsin No Yes Yes No 2 2
Wyoming Yes Yes Yes No 3 1

See also

Footnotes