Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION v. COLUMBIA BROADCASTING SYSTEM OF CALIFORNIA, INC. (1940)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION v. COLUMBIA BROADCASTING SYSTEM OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
Term: 1940
Important Dates
Argued: November 15, 1940
Decided: November 25, 1940
Outcome
Reversed
Vote
9-0
Majority
Hugo BlackWilliam DouglasFelix FrankfurterCharles Evans HughesJames Clark McReynoldsFrank MurphyStanley ReedOwen Josephus RobertsHarlan Fiske Stone

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION v. COLUMBIA BROADCASTING SYSTEM OF CALIFORNIA, INC. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on November 25, 1940. The case was argued before the court on November 15, 1940.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit (includes the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia but not the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which has local jurisdiction).

For a full list of cases decided in the 1940s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Hughes Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Economic Activity - Federal and some few state regulation of public utilities regulation: radio and television (cf. cable television)
  • Petitioner: Federal Communications Commission (including a predecessor, Federal Radio Commission)
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Radio station
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 311 U.S. 132
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Charles Evans Hughes
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Felix Frankfurter

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes