Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION v. WISCONSIN RIGHT TO LIFE, INC. (2007)

![]() |
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION v. WISCONSIN RIGHT TO LIFE, INC. |
---|
Term: 2006 |
Important Dates |
Argued: April 25, 2007 |
Decided: June 25, 2007 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
5-4 |
Majority |
John Roberts |
Concurring |
Samuel Alito • Anthony Kennedy • Antonin Scalia • Clarence Thomas |
Dissenting |
Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • David Souter • John Paul Stevens |
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION v. WISCONSIN RIGHT TO LIFE, INC. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 25, 2007. The case was argued before the court on April 25, 2007.
In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the District Of Columbia U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: First Amendment - campaign spending (cf. governmental corruption):
- Petitioner: Federal Election Commission
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Public interest organization
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 551 U.S. 449
- How the court took jurisdiction: Appeal
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
- Who wrote the majority opinion: John Roberts
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes