FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION v. SOUTH CAROLINA STATE PORTS AUTHORITY et al. (2002)

![]() |
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION v. SOUTH CAROLINA STATE PORTS AUTHORITY et al. |
---|
Term: 2001 |
Important Dates |
Argued: February 25, 2002 |
Decided: May 28, 2002 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
5-4 |
Majority |
Anthony Kennedy • Sandra Day O'Connor • William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia • Clarence Thomas |
Dissenting |
Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • David Souter • John Paul Stevens |
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION v. SOUTH CAROLINA STATE PORTS AUTHORITY et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 28, 2002. The case was argued before the court on February 25, 2002.
In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Federalism - national supremacy: public utilities (cf. federal public utilities regulation)
- Petitioner: Federal Maritime Commission
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: State commission, board, committee, or authority
- Respondent state: South Carolina
- Citation: 535 U.S. 743
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Clarence Thomas
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes