Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. SUPERIOR COURT TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION et al. (1990)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. SUPERIOR COURT TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION et al.
Term: 1989
Important Dates
Argued: October 30, 1989
Decided: January 22, 1990
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
6-3
Majority
Anthony KennedySandra Day O'ConnorWilliam RehnquistAntonin ScaliaJohn Paul StevensByron White
Dissenting
Harry BlackmunWilliam BrennanThurgood Marshall

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. SUPERIOR COURT TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on January 22, 1990. The case was argued before the court on October 30, 1989.

In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit (includes the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia but not the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which has local jurisdiction).

For a full list of cases decided in the 1980s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: First Amendment - protest demonstrations (other than as pertains to sit-in demonstrations): demonstrations and other forms of protest based on First Amendment guarantees
  • Petitioner: Federal Trade Commission
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Attorney, or person acting as such;includes bar applicant or law student, or law firm or bar association
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 493 U.S. 411
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: John Paul Stevens

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes