Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
FLORIDA et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. (1934)

| FLORIDA et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. |
|---|
| Term: 1933 |
| Important Dates |
| Argued: February 13, 1934 |
| Decided: April 2, 1934 |
| Outcome |
| Affirmed (includes modified) |
| Vote |
| 9-0 |
| Majority |
| Louis Dembitz Brandeis • Pierce Butler • Benjamin Nathan Cardozo • Charles Evans Hughes • James Clark McReynolds • Owen Josephus Roberts • Harlan Fiske Stone • George Sutherland • Willis Van Devanter |
FLORIDA et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on April 2, 1934. The case was argued before the court on February 13, 1934.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Georgia Northern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1930s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Hughes Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - Patents and copyrights: patentability of computer processes
- Petitioner: State
- Petitioner state: Florida
- Respondent type: Interstate Commerce Commission
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 292 U.S. 1
- How the court took jurisdiction: Appeal
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Charles Evans Hughes
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Charles Evans Hughes
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes