FLORIDA v. J. L. (2000)

![]() |
FLORIDA v. J. L. |
---|
Term: 1999 |
Important Dates |
Argued: February 29, 2000 |
Decided: March 28, 2000 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
9-0 |
Majority |
Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Sandra Day O'Connor • Antonin Scalia • David Souter • John Paul Stevens • Clarence Thomas |
Concurring |
Anthony Kennedy • William Rehnquist |
FLORIDA v. J. L. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 28, 2000. The case was argued before the court on February 29, 2000.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Florida State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - search and seizure (other than as pertains to vehicles or Crime Control Act)
- Petitioner: State
- Petitioner state: Florida
- Respondent type: Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 529 U.S. 266
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Ruth Bader Ginsburg
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes