FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA v. GILBERT P. HYATT, et al. (2003)

| FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA v. GILBERT P. HYATT, et al. |
|---|
| Term: 2002 |
| Important Dates |
| Argued: February 24, 2003 |
| Decided: April 23, 2003 |
| Outcome |
| Affirmed (includes modified) |
| Vote |
| 9-0 |
| Majority |
| Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Anthony Kennedy • Sandra Day O'Connor • William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia • David Souter • John Paul Stevens • Clarence Thomas |
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA v. GILBERT P. HYATT, et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on April 23, 2003. The case was argued before the court on February 24, 2003.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Nevada State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Interstate Relations - Miscellaneous interstate relations conflict
- Petitioner: State commission, board, committee, or authority
- Petitioner state: California
- Respondent type: State or local governmental taxpayer, or executor of the estate of
- Respondent state: Nevada
- Citation: 538 U.S. 488
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Sandra Day O'Connor
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as unspecifiable.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes