FRANCIS A. ORFF, et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. (2005)

![]() |
FRANCIS A. ORFF, et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. |
---|
Term: 2004 |
Important Dates |
Argued: February 23, 2005 |
Decided: June 23, 2005 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
9-0 |
Majority |
Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Anthony Kennedy • Sandra Day O'Connor • William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia • David Souter • John Paul Stevens • Clarence Thomas |
FRANCIS A. ORFF, et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 23, 2005. The case was argued before the court on February 23, 2005.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the California Eastern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - Natural resources - environmental protection (cf. national supremacy: natural resources, national supremacy: pollution)
- Petitioner: Farmer, farm worker, or farm organization
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: United States
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 545 U.S. 596
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Clarence Thomas
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes