Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
FROST & FROST TRUCKING CO. v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA (1926)

![]() |
FROST & FROST TRUCKING CO. v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA |
---|
Term: 1925 |
Important Dates |
Argued: April 21, 1926 |
Decided: June 7, 1926 |
Outcome |
Reversed |
Vote |
6-3 |
Majority |
Pierce Butler • Edward Terry Sanford • Harlan Fiske Stone • George Sutherland • William Howard Taft • Willis Van Devanter |
Dissenting |
Louis Dembitz Brandeis • Oliver Wendell Holmes • James Clark McReynolds |
FROST & FROST TRUCKING CO. v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 7, 1926. The case was argued before the court on April 21, 1926.
In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1920s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Taft Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Due Process - Due process: takings clause, or other non-constitutional governmental taking of property
- Petitioner: Trucking company, or motor carrier
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: State commission, board, committee, or authority
- Respondent state: California
- Citation: 271 U.S. 583
- How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Howard Taft
- Who wrote the majority opinion: George Sutherland
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes