FULLINWIDER v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA et al. (1919)

![]() |
FULLINWIDER v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA et al. |
---|
Term: 1918 |
Important Dates |
Decided: January 13, 1919 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
9-0 |
Majority |
Louis Dembitz Brandeis • John Hessin Clarke • William Rufus Day • Oliver Wendell Holmes • Joseph McKenna • James Clark McReynolds • Mahlon Pitney • Willis Van Devanter • Edward Douglass White |
FULLINWIDER v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on January 13, 1919.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the California Southern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1910s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the White Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - Federal or state regulation of transportation regulation: railroad
- Petitioner: Buyer, purchaser
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Railroad
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 248 U.S. 409
- How the court took jurisdiction: Appeal
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Edward Douglass White
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Joseph McKenna
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes