Federal Judgeship Act of 2013
The Federal Judgeship Act of 2013 (S. 1385) was introduced by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Senator Chris Coons (D-DE) on July 30, 2013. The bill aims to establish 91 new federal circuit and district court judgeships.
Background
The Federal Judgeship Act of 2013 is another attempt by Senator Leahy, who also introduced the Federal Judgeship Act of 2009, to increase the number of permanent and temporary judgeships on the federal courts.
The last comprehensive judgeship bill to be passed was in 1990. That measure created 11 additional circuit court judgeships and 61 permanent and 13 temporary district court judgeships.[1]
According to the Secretary of the Judicial Conference, Judge Thomas Hogan:
“ | Nationwide, our Article III district court have experienced a 38 percent growth in caseload since 1990 while seeing only a 4 percent increase in judgeships during this same time period.[2] [3] | ” |
Summary of legislation
This bill would create 5 new permanent circuit judgeships, 65 new permanent district judgeships, 1 new temporary circuit judgeship, 20 new temporary district judgeships, and permanent 8 temporary judgeships.
Permanent judgeships created
In the 2nd Circuit:
- 2 for the Eastern District of New York
- 1 for the Southern District of New York
- 1 for the Western District of New York
In the 3rd Circuit:
- 2 for the District of New Jersey
- 1 for the District of Delaware
In the 5th Circuit:
- 2 for the Eastern District of Texas
- 2 for the Southern District of Texas
- 4 for the Western District of Texas
In the 6th Circuit:
- 1 for the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals
In the 7th Circuit:
- 1 for the Southern District of Indiana
- 1 for the Western District of Wisconsin
In the 8th Circuit:
- 1 for the District of Minnesota
In the 9th Circuit:
- 4 for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
- 6 for the District of Arizona
- 10 for the Central District of California
- 6 for the Eastern District of California
- 5 for the Northern District of California
- 3 for the Southern District of California
- 1 for the District of Idaho
- 1 for the District of Nevada
- 2 for the Western District of Washington
In the 10th Circuit:
- 2 for the District of Colorado
- 1 for the District of New Mexico
In the 11th Circuit:
- 3 for the Southern District of Florida
- 5 for the Middle District of Florida
- 1 for the Northern District of Florida
- 1 for the Northern District of Georgia[2]
Temporary judgeships created
In the 2nd Circuit:
- 1 for the Southern District of New York
In the 3rd Circuit:
- 1 for the District of New Jersey
In the 4th Circuit:
- 1 for the Eastern District of Virginia
In the 5th Circuit:
- 1 for the Western District of Texas
In the 6th Circuit:
- 1 for the Middle District of Tennessee
In the 8th Circuit:
- 1 for the District of Minnesota
- 1 for the Western District of Missouri
In the 9th Circuit:
- 1 on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
- 4 for the District of Arizona
- 2 for the Central District of California
- 1 for the Eastern District of California
- 1 for the Northern District of California
- 1 for the Southern District of California
- 1 for the District of Nevada
- 1 for the District of Oregon
In the 11th Circuit:
- 1 for the Middle District of Florida
- 1 for the Northern District of Georgia
Permanent status to temporary judgeships
In the 5th Circuit:
- 1 in the Eastern District of Texas
In the 8th Circuit:
- 1 in the Eastern District of Missouri.
In the 9th Circuit:
- 1 in the District of Arizona
- 1 in the Central District of California
In the 10th Circuit:
- 1 in the District of Kansas
- 1 in the District of New Mexico
In the 11th Circuit:
- 1 in the Northern District of Alabama
- 1 in the Southern District of Florida[4]
Chance of success
According to govtrack.us, this bill had a 44 percent chance of getting past the Senate Judiciary Committee and only a 9 percent chance of being enacted.[5]
See also
External links
- Full text of S. 1385: Federal Judgeship Act of 2013
- United States Courts, "Caseload Increases Stress Need for New Federal Judgeships," September 10, 2013
Footnotes
- ↑ American Bar Association, " Statement of the American Bar Association," September 30, 2009
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 LegalNewsline.com, "Leahy, Coons introduce bill to create 91 new federal judgeships," July 31, 2013
- ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ Office of U.S. Senator Christopher Coons, "Senators Coons, Leahy introduce bill to create 91 new judgehships," July 30, 2013
- ↑ Govtrack.us, "S. 1385: Federal Judgeship Act of 2013"