Florida Amendment 2, Permanent Cap on Nonhomestead Parcel Assessment Increases Amendment (2018)

Elections in Florida, 2018

• General election: Nov. 6
• Voter registration deadline: Oct. 9
• Early voting: Oct. 27 - Nov. 3
• Absentee voting deadline: Nov. 6

• Online registration: Yes
• Same-day registration: No
• Voter ID: Photo ID required
• Poll times: 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.

---

On the ballot: U.S. Senate • U.S. House • Governor • Attorney General • State executive offices • State Senate • State House • Special state legislative • Supreme court • Appellate courts • Local judges • State ballot measures • Local ballot measures • School boards • Municipal • Democratic primaries • Republican primaries

Florida Amendment 2
Election date November 6, 2018
Topic Taxes and Property
Status a Approved
Type Constitutional amendment	Origin State legislature
List of Florida measuresFlorida Amendment 1Florida Amendment 2Florida Amendment 3Florida Amendment 4Florida Amendment 5Florida Amendment 6Florida Amendment 7Florida Amendment 9Florida Amendment 10Florida Amendment 11Florida Amendment 12Florida Amendment 13Submit

Florida Amendment 2, the Permanent Cap on Nonhomestead Parcel Assessment Increases Amendment, was on the ballot in Florida as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 6, 2018. It was approved.

A "yes" vote supported this amendment to make permanent the cap of 10 percent on annual nonhomestead parcel assessment increases set to expire on January 1, 2019.

A "no" vote opposed this amendment to make permanent the cap of 10 percent on annual nonhomestead parcel assessment increases set to expire on January 1, 2019.

Supermajority requirement: A 60 percent supermajority vote was required for the approval of Amendment 2.

Election results

Florida Amendment 2
Result		Votes	Percentage
Yes		5,162,544	66.49%
No		2,601,316	33.51%

Results are officially certified.

Source

Overview

Amendment design

Amendment 2 was designed to make permanent the cap of 10 percent on annual nonhomestead parcel assessment increases set to expire on January 1, 2019. The cap did not apply to school district taxes. Voters approved the cap in 2008, when 64 percent voted to pass Amendment 1.

Properties considered nonhomestead parcels included nonhomestead residential properties, such as second homes and rental apartments, and nonresidential property, such as commercial property and vacant land.

Campaigns for and against Amendment 2

Amendment 2 is for Everybody and Everybody is for Amendment 2 were the committees registered in support of the measure; both committees were associated and all contributions overlapped. The support campaign had raised $11.04 million and spent $10.86 million.

One committee, Citizens for Equitable Tax Policy, Inc., was registered in opposition to Amendment 2. The opposition committee raised $120,000 and spent $102,693. The top contributor to the support campaign was the Florida Association of Realtors, which gave $11.01 million. The top contributor to the opposition campaign was Steven Smith who had provided all $120,000 in contributions to the opposition committee.

Text of measure

Ballot title

The following was the ballot title:

“

LIMITATIONS ON PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENTS.

”

Ballot summary

The ballot summary was as follows:

“

Proposing an amendment to the State Constitution to permanently retain provisions currently in effect, which limit property tax assessment increases on specified nonhomestead real property, except for school district taxes, to 10 percent each year. If approved, the amendment removes the scheduled repeal of such provisions in 2019 and shall take effect January 1, 2019.

”

Constitutional changes

See also: Article XII, Florida Constitution

The proposed amendment amended Section 27 of Article XII of the Florida Constitution. The following underlined text was added, and struck-through text was deleted:

Note: Hover over the text and scroll to see the full text.

Property Tax Exemptions and Limitations on Property Tax Assessments

(a) The amendments to Sections 3, 4, and 6 of Article VII, providing a $25,000 exemption for tangible personal property, providing an additional $25,000 homestead exemption, authorizing transfer of the accrued benefit from the limitations on the assessment of homestead property, and this section, if submitted to the electors of this state for approval or rejection at a special election authorized by law to be held on January 29, 2008, shall take effect upon approval by the electors and shall operate retroactively to January 1, 2008, or, if submitted to the electors of this state for approval or rejection at the next general election, shall take effect January 1 of the year following such general election. The amendments to Section 4 of Article VII creating subsections (g) (f) and (h) (g) of that section, creating a limitation on annual assessment increases for specified real property, shall take effect upon approval of the electors and shall first limit assessments beginning January 1, 2009, if approved at a special election held on January 29, 2008, or shall first limit assessments beginning January 1, 2010, if approved at the general election held in November of 2008. Subsections (f) and (g) of Section 4 of Article VII are repealed effective January 1, 2019; however, the legislature shall by joint resolution propose an amendment abrogating the repeal of subsections (f) and (g), which shall be submitted to the electors of this state for approval or rejection at the general election of 2018 and, if approved, shall take effect January 1, 2019.

(b) The amendment to subsection (a) abrogating the scheduled repeal of subsections (g) and (h) of Section 4 of Article VII of the State Constitution as it existed in 2017, shall take effect January 1, 2019.

Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2018

Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title and summary for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The state legislature wrote the ballot language for this measure. The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 15, and the FRE is -1. The word count for the ballot title is 5, and the estimated reading time is 1 second. The FKGL for the ballot summary is grade level 17, and the FRE is 20. The word count for the ballot summary is 51, and the estimated reading time is 13 seconds. In 2018, for the 167 statewide measures on the ballot, the average ballot title or question was written at a level appropriate for those with between 19 and 20 years of U.S. formal education (graduate school-level of education), according to the FKGL formula. Read Ballotpedia's entire 2018 ballot language readability report here.

Support

Amendment 2 is for Everybody led the campaign in support of the measure.

Supporters

• Florida Association of Realtors
• Florida TaxWatch
• Florida Chamber of Commerce
• Republican Party of Palm Beach County
• Florida Family Policy Council
• Tampa Bay Young Republicans

Arguments

Dominic Calabro (president and CEO) and Pat Neal (chairman) of Florida TaxWatch made the following argument:

“

Floridians must vote “yes” on Amendment 2. Renters, business owners and consumers will be in for a major property tax increase if it fails to pass. If the amendment fails to pass, all non-homestead property would be assessed at its full value beginning in January 2019, and the combined potential tax increase could reach nearly $700 million per year. Going forward, there would be no limit as to how high property tax assessments could go. If you want to keep the Sunshine State competitive and thriving, the 10 percent cap on non-homestead assessments must be made permanent.

”

Campaign advertisements

The following video was the support campaign's advertisement:

Title: "Everybody is for Amendment 2"

Opposition

Vote No on 2 - Citizens for Equitable Tax Policy led the campaign in opposition to Amendment 2.

Opponents

• League of Women Voters of Florida
• Democratic Progressive Caucus of Florida

Arguments

• The League of Women Voters of Florida stated, "The League has a position that no tax sources or revenue should be specified, limited, exempted, or prohibited in the Constitution."

• The Vote No on 2 - Citizens for Equitable Tax Policy campaign website provided the following argument:

“ Protect our Communities, VOTE NO ON AMENDMENT 2 Local Government relies on property tax revenue to provide vital governmental services such as safety (police and fire), parks, public transportation and libraries, all of which attract people to live in the State of Florida. Protect our First Responders, VOTE NO ON AMENDMENT 2 Police and Fire (First Responders) are integral to a safe and thriving community. We must protect the funding for our essential emergency services. Protect our Teachers, VOTE NO ON AMENDMENT 2 Although the tax cap does not apply directly to funds that schools receive through property taxes, we need to protect our Schools and education budget from being saddled with an increased burden to provide children’s services which has been shifted to the School board as a result of underfunded local government brought about by Amendment 2. Protect our Local Businesses, VOTE NO ON AMENDMENT 2 Local businesses are critical to the economic success of our state. Amendment 2 amounts to corporate welfare for some of the largest properties in the state. These mega malls and oceanfront hotels are often owned by Wall Street investors and foreign corporations. Our locals are left holding the bag. Protect our Renters, VOTE NO ON AMENDMENT 2 Stable rent provides renters with security. Voting No on Amendment 2 would ensure that rental properties {apartments} are taxed similarly regardless of the length of ownership. This provides for a healthy and competitive market place, and is attractive to investors who provide much of our rental housing stock. ”

Media editorials

See also: 2018 ballot measure media endorsements

Support

• The Sun Sentinel said: "We recommend YES. Proposed by the Legislature, it makes permanent a provision that limits property tax increases to 10 percent, other than for school taxes, on non-homesteaded properties. The ceiling was adopted in 2008 to moderate the tax disparity with owner-occupied homes, which are assessed at about half the tax rate. This proposal passed the 2017 legislature with only three “no” votes in the House. It would not apply when property is sold or when improvements boost the value by more than 25 percent. Some local governments have been hoping for a windfall when the cap expires next year, but the text of the 2008 amendment instructed the present Legislature to propose making it permanent. Should voters disagree, commercial and other non-homesteaded properties could be reassessed at their current value next year, yielding an estimated $688 million in additional revenue from the same millage rates. That strikes us as unfair to small businesses, snowbirds and renters whose landlords would pass on the increase. A committee backing the amendment points out, accurately, that 'Amendment 2 is the only protection for renters in Florida.'"

• The News-Press said: "Yes on Amendment 2: This amendment doesn't change current law, but it places a 10-percent cap on the annual increase of non-homestead property tax assessments. That helps renters, business owners and consumers because a no vote means owners of these properties could see taxes on the full value of properties. That translates into higher costs for renters, business owners and their consumers, and hurts those on fixed incomes."

• The Naples Daily News said: "Florida has a 10 percent maximum on how much the property tax assessment can go up every year for any property that doesn’t have a homestead exemption, such as businesses or rental units. That cap is about to expire. Amendment 2 makes the 10 percent cap permanent. We hope any voter predisposed to reject the amendments pauses to vote “yes” on this. Homesteaded properties benefit from a maximum 3 percent year-to-year assessment increase, which can be even lower if the change in the Consumer Price Index is less."

• Your Observer said: "It will permanently limit government taxing power, which concurrently increases individuals’ liberty. We recommend: Vote yes."

• The Treasure Coast Newspapers said: "While our board has misgivings about the permanent nature of this extension, we recognize the burden it would impose on renters and small-business owners if the 10-percent cap is allowed to expire."

Additional editorial endorsements

In addition to the above editorial endorsements, the following outlets have also endorsed a yes vote on the measure:

• The Florida Times-Union
• The Herald-Tribune
• The Independent Florida Alligator
• Orlando Sentinel
• The Miami Herald

Opposition

• The Tampa Bay Times said: "The taxable value of non-homestead properties currently cannot rise by more than 10 percent a year, a constitutional cap that is set to expire on Jan. 1. This measure would make that cap permanent. Although it’s an easy crowd-pleaser for the Legislature to put on the ballot, the measure would deny local governments the full effect of rising property values, once again, hamstringing them. It is estimated that amendments 1 and 2 together would cost local governments $1.3 billion a year. If voters think their local taxes are too high, they can turn their local leaders out of office. On Amendment 2, the Tampa Bay Times recommends voting No."

• The Tallahassee Democrat said: "Amendments 1 and 2 are a couple of tax proposals sponsored by the Legislature, because who doesn’t like tax cuts? The latter is preferable to the former, but neither rise to constitutional amendment worthiness."

• The Daily Commercial said, "NO. This would permanently ensure that the taxable value of rental and commercial property doesn’t increase more than 10 percent a year. Florida should be working to make its tax rolls more realistic, not less. This would force property appraisers to pretend land isn’t gaining significant value, even when it is."

Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Florida ballot measures

Total campaign contributions:
Support:	$11,040,786.50
Opposition:	$120,000.00

Amendment 2 is for Everybody and Everybody is for Amendment 2 were the committees registered in support of the measure; both committees were associated and all contributions overlapped. The support campaign had raised $11.04 million and spent $10.86 million.

One committee, Citizens for Equitable Tax Policy, Inc., was registered in opposition to Amendment 2. The opposition committee raised $120,000 and spent $102,693. The top contributor to the support campaign was the Florida Association of Realtors, which gave $11.01 million. The top contributor to the opposition campaign was Steven Smith who had provided all $120,000 in contributions to the opposition committee.

Support

The contribution and expenditure totals for the committee in support of the initiative were current as of the most recent reports available.

Committees in support of Amendment 2 Supporting committees Cash contributions In-kind services Cash expenditures Amendment 2 is for Everybody $11,012,401.50 $28,385.00 $10,857,998.93 Total $11,012,401.50 $28,385.00 $10,857,998.93

Totals in support Total raised: $11,040,786.50 Total spent: $10,886,383.93

Donors

Five donors provided 100 percent of the contributions to the committee.

Donor	Cash	In-kind	Total
Florida Association of Realtors	$11,010,000.00	$0.00	$11,010,000.00
Florida Realtors	$0.00	$23,000.00	$23,000.00
Everybody is for Amendment 2	$8,034.00	$5,385.00	$5,385.00
Rosen Hotels and Resorts	$0.00	$0.00	$8,034.00
Electioneering Consulting, Inc.	$100.00	$0.00	$100.00

Opposition

Committees in opposition to Florida Amendment 2 Opposing committees Cash contributions In-kind services Cash expenditures Citizens for Equitable Tax Policy, Inc. $120,000.00 $0.00 $102,692.25 Total $120,000.00 $0.00 $102,692.25

Totals in opposition Total raised: $120,000.00 Total spent: $102,692.25

Donors

The only donor to the opposition committee is listed below.

Donor	Cash	In-kind	Total
Steven Smith	$120,000.00	$0.00	$120,000.00

Methodology

To read Ballotpedia's methodology for covering ballot measure campaign finance information, click here.

Background

Amendment 1 of 2008

See also: Florida Save Our Homes, Amendment 1 (January 2008)

In 2008, voters approved Amendment 1, a constitutional amendment that, among other provisions, created a cap of 10 percent on annual nonhomestead parcel assessment increases. Amendment 1 set the cap to expire on January 1, 2019.

The Florida State Legislature referred Amendment 1 to the ballot. On October 29, 2017, the Florida House of Representatives passed the amendment 97 to 18, and the Florida State Senate passed the amendment 35 to 4.

Ballot measures to cap, limit, or restrict taxes in 2018

See also: Taxes on the ballot

In 2018, voters in six states considered ballot measures to cap, limit, or restrict types of taxes. In Oregon and Washington, voters decided ballot initiatives to prohibit governments from enacting taxes on groceries. Oregan voters rejected the grocery tax ban. In Washington, the measure was ahead by 5 percentage points with 64 percent of precincts reporting.

In Arizona, an initiative to prohibit new taxes or increased tax rates on services was approved. Voters in California defeated an initiated measure to require voter approval for the state legislature to impose, increase, or extend fuel taxes or vehicle fees in the future. It would have also repealed a gas tax increase passed in 2017.

Legislatures in Florida and North Carolina referred constitutional amendments capping taxes to the ballot and both were approved. Voters in Florida and Oregon also considered ballot measures to require supermajorities of the state legislature to increase taxes. In Florida, the measure was approved, and, in Oregon, it was defeated.

An additional initiative qualified for the ballot in California but was withdrawn after proponents agreed to a compromise bill with legislators to keep the initiative off the ballot. The initiative would have required a two-thirds vote of the electorate on all local taxes, including soda taxes. The compromise legislation prohibited local soda taxes until 2031.

Measure	Origin	Description	Status
Arizona Proposition 126	Initiative	Prohibits the state and local governments from enacting new taxes or increasing tax rates on services	a
California Proposition 6	Initiative	Requires voter approval for the state legislature to impose, increase, or extend fuel taxes or vehicle fees in the future	d
Florida Amendment 2	Legislature	Makes permanent the cap of 10 percent on annual nonhomestead parcel assessment increases set to expire	a
Florida Amendment 5	Legislature	Requires a two-thirds vote of each chamber of the state legislature to enact new taxes or fees or increase existing ones	a
North Carolina Amendment	Legislature	Lowers the maximum allowable state income tax rate from 10 percent to 7 percent	a
Oregon Measure 103	Initiative	Prohibits state and local governments from enacting taxes on groceries	d
Oregon Measure 104	Initiative	Requires a three-fifths vote of each chamber of the state legislature to increase revenue, such as via increasing taxes and decreasing tax exemptions	d
Washington Initiative 1634	Initiative	Prohibits local governments from enacting taxes on groceries	a

Referred amendments on the ballot

From 1996 through 2016, the state legislature referred 38 constitutional amendments to the ballot. Voters approved 25 and rejected 13 of the referred amendments. All of the amendments were referred to the ballot for elections during even-numbered election years. The average number of amendments appearing on even-year ballots was between three and four. In 2016, three referred amendments were on the ballot. The approval rate of referred amendments at the ballot box was 65.8 percent during the 20-year period from 1996 through 2016. The rejection rate was 34.2 percent.

Legislatively-referred constitutional amendments, 1996-2016
Total number	Approved	Percent approved	Defeated	Percent defeated	Annual average	Annual median	Annual minimum	Annual maximum
38	25	65.79%	13	34.21%	3.45	3.00	0	11

Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Florida Constitution

In Florida, a constitutional amendment must be passed by a 60 percent vote in each house of the state legislature during one legislative session.

On January 23, 2017, the amendment was filed in the state legislature as House Joint Resolution 21. The Florida House of Representatives approved the measure, 110 to 3 with seven members not voting, on March 23, 2017. The Florida Senate approved the measure, 35 to 0 with four members not voting, on April 26, 2017. One senate seat was vacant at the time of the vote.

The measure was enrolled with the secretary of state on May 8, 2017.

Vote in the Florida House of Representatives March 23, 2017
Requirement: Three-fifths (60 percent) vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 72  a
	Yes	No	Not voting
Total	110	3	7
Total percent	91.67%	2.50%	5.83%
Democrat	34	3	4
Republican	76	0	3

Vote in the Florida State Senate April 26, 2017
Requirement: Three-fifths (60 percent) vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 24  a
	Yes	No	Not voting
Total	35	0	4
Total percent	89.74%	0.00%	10.26%
Democrat	13	0	2
Republican	22	0	2

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Florida

Poll times

In Florida, all polls are open from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. local time. Florida is divided between the Eastern and Central time zones. An individual who is in line at the time polls close must be allowed to vote.

Registration requirements

Check your voter registration status here.

To vote in Florida, one must be at least 18 years of age, a citizen of the United States, and a legal resident of Florida and the county in which he or she intends to vote. Pre-registration is available beginning at 16 years of age.

Voters may retrieve registration applications at the following locations:

• Local elections offices
• Public assistance agencies
• Disability services agencies
• Independent living centers
• Military recruitment offices
• Public libraries
• Drivers license office
• Tax collector's office
• The office of any entity authorized by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission to issue fishing, hunting, or trapping permits

A registration form is also available online. The form can be printed and submitted via mail.

Click here to find your county Supervisor of Elections.

Automatic registration

Florida does not practice automatic voter registration.

Online registration

See also: Online voter registration

Florida has implemented an online voter registration system. Residents can register to vote by visiting this website.

Voters may also apply for or modify their voter registration status while renewing their driver's license through the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles’ online renewal system here.

Same-day registration

Florida does not allow same-day voter registration.

Residency requirements

To register to vote in Florida, you must be a resident of the state. State law does not specify a length of time for which you must have been a resident to be eligible.

Verification of citizenship

See also: Laws permitting noncitizens to vote in the United States

Florida does not require proof of citizenship for voter registration. An individual must attest that they are a U.S. citizen when registering to vote. According to the state's voter registration application, "it is a 3rd degree felony to submit false information."

All 49 states with voter registration systems require applicants to declare that they are U.S. citizens in order to register to vote in state and federal elections, under penalty of perjury or other punishment. Seven states — Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Wyoming — have laws requiring verification of citizenship at the time of voter registration, whether in effect or not. In three states — California, Maryland, and Vermont — at least one local jurisdiction allows noncitizens to vote in some local elections. Noncitizens registering to vote in those elections must complete a voter registration application provided by the local jurisdiction and are not eligible to register as state or federal voters.

Verifying your registration

The page Voter Information Lookup, run by the Florida Department of State, allows residents to check their voter registration status online.

Voter ID requirements

Florida requires voters to present photo identification with a signature while voting.

The following list of accepted ID was current as of July 2024. Click here for the Florida Secretary of State's page on accepted ID to ensure you have the most current information.

• Florida driver’s license
• Florida identification card issued by the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles
• United States passport
• Debit or credit card
• Military identification
• Student identification
• Retirement center identification
• Neighborhood association identification
• Public assistance identification
• Veteran health identification card issued by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs
• License to carry a concealed weapon or firearm issued pursuant to s. 790.06
• Employee identification card issued by any branch, department, agency, or entity of the federal government, the state, a county, or a municipality

A voter who presents an ID without a signature must show a second form of identification that includes the voter’s signature.

State profile

Demographic data for Florida
	Florida	U.S.
Total population:	20,244,914	316,515,021
Land area (sq mi):	53,625	3,531,905
Race and ethnicity**
White:	76%	73.6%
Black/African American:	16.1%	12.6%
Asian:	2.6%	5.1%
Native American:	0.3%	0.8%
Pacific Islander:	0.1%	0.2%
Two or more:	2.4%	3%
Hispanic/Latino:	23.7%	17.1%
Education
High school graduation rate:	86.9%	86.7%
College graduation rate:	27.3%	29.8%
Income
Median household income:	$47,507	$53,889
Persons below poverty level:	19.8%	11.3%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, "American Community Survey" (5-year estimates 2010-2015) Click here for more information on the 2020 census and here for more on its impact on the redistricting process in Florida. **Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here.

Presidential voting pattern

See also: Presidential voting trends in Florida

Florida voted Republican in five out of the seven presidential elections between 2000 and 2024.

Pivot Counties (2016)

Ballotpedia identified 206 counties that voted for Donald Trump (R) in 2016 after voting for Barack Obama (D) in 2008 and 2012. Collectively, Trump won these Pivot Counties by more than 580,000 votes. Of these 206 counties, four are located in Florida, accounting for 1.94 percent of the total pivot counties.

Pivot Counties (2020)

In 2020, Ballotpedia re-examined the 206 Pivot Counties to view their voting patterns following that year's presidential election. Ballotpedia defined those won by Trump won as Retained Pivot Counties and those won by Joe Biden (D) as Boomerang Pivot Counties. Nationwide, there were 181 Retained Pivot Counties and 25 Boomerang Pivot Counties. Florida had three Retained Pivot Counties and one Boomerang Pivot County, accounting for 1.66 and 4.00 percent of all Retained and Boomerang Pivot Counties, respsectively.

More Florida coverage on Ballotpedia

• Elections in Florida
• United States congressional delegations from Florida
• Public policy in Florida
• Endorsers in Florida
• Florida fact checks
• More...

Related measures

Taxes measures on the ballot in 2018
State	Measures
Virginia	Virginia Question 1: Property Tax Exemption for Flood Abatement Amendment a
Nevada	Nevada Question 4: Medical Equipment Sales Tax Exemption Amendment a
Oregon	Oregon Measure 101: Healthcare Insurance Premiums Tax for Medicaid Referendum a
Georgia	Georgia Amendment 3, Forest Land Conservation and Timberland Properties Amendment a
Virginia	Virginia Question 2: Remove Restriction on Residence for Surviving Spouse of Disabled Veteran Tax Exemption Amendment a
Oklahoma	Oklahoma State Question 801: Allow Certain Voter-Approved Property Taxes to Fund School District Operations Amendment d
Maine	Maine Question 1: Payroll and Non-Wage Income Taxes for Home Care Program Initiative d
Georgia	Georgia Referendum A: Homestead Municipal Property Tax Exemption a
South Dakota	South Dakota Initiated Measure 25, Tobacco Tax Increase Initiative d
Washington	Washington Advisory Vote 19, Non-Binding Question on Oil Spill Tax Repeal d
Missouri	Missouri Proposition D: Gas Tax Increase, Olympic Prize Tax Exemption, and Traffic Reduction Fund Measure d
Georgia	Georgia Referendum B: Include Business-Financed Properties in Existing Non-Profit Mentally Disabled Housing Tax Exemption a
Louisiana	Louisiana Amendment 6: Phase-In of Tax Increases from Property Reappraisal Amendment a
Utah	Utah Constitutional Amendment B: Tax Exemption for Property Leased by a Government Entity d
Montana	Montana LR-128: Property Tax for State University System Measure a
Utah	Utah Nonbinding Opinion Question 1, 10 Cents per Gallon Gas Tax Increase for Education and Local Roads d
Arizona	Arizona Proposition 126: Prohibit New or Increased Taxes on Services Initiative a
Florida	Florida Amendment 5: Two-Thirds Vote of Legislature to Increase Taxes or Fees Amendment a
Colorado	Colorado Proposition 110, "Let's Go Colorado" Transportation Bond and Sales Tax Increase Initiative d
Colorado	Colorado Amendment 73, Establish Income Tax Brackets and Raise Taxes for Education Initiative d
Montana	Montana I-185, Extend Medicaid Expansion and Increase Tobacco Taxes Initiative d
California	California Proposition 72: Rainwater Capture Systems Excluded from Property Tax Assessments Amendment a
California	California Proposition 5: Property Tax Transfer Initiative d
Washington	Washington Initiative 1631, Carbon Emissions Fee Measure d
California	California Proposition 6: Vote on Future Gas and Vehicle Taxes and 2017 Tax Repeal Initiative d
Oregon	Oregon Measure 103: Ban Tax on Groceries Initiative d
Washington	Washington Initiative 1634: Prohibit Local Taxes on Groceries Measure a
Utah	Utah Constitutional Amendment A: Active Military Property Tax Exemption a

See also

2018 measures

• 2018 ballot measures
• Taxes on the ballot
• Property on the ballot

Florida

• Florida ballot measures
• Florida ballot measure laws

News and analysis

• Ballot measure lawsuits
• Ballot measure readability
• Ballot measure polls

External links

• House Joint Resolution 21
• Search Google News for this topic

Support

• Everybody is for Amendment 2 website
• Everybody is for Amendment 2 Facebook
• Everybody is for Amendment 2 Twitter
• Everybody is for Amendment 2 YouTube

Opposition

• Vote No on 2 - Citizens for Equitable Tax Policy website

Recent news

The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms Florida 2018 Nonhomestead Assessment Amendment. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

Florida Amendment 2, Permanent Cap on Nonhomestead Parcel Assessment Increases Amendment (2018) - Google News