Flowing Wells Unified School District, Arizona, elections
| Flowing Wells Unified School District |
|---|
 |
| District details |
| School board members: 5 |
| Students: 5,287 (2023-2024) |
| Schools: 11 (2023-2024) |
| Website: Link |
Flowing Wells Unified School District is a school district in Arizona (Pima County). During the 2024 school year, 5,287 students attended one of the district's 11 schools.
This page provides information regarding school board members, election rules, finances, academics, policies, and more details about the district.
Elections
Do you know of an individual or group that endorsed a candidate for a position on this board? Click here to let us know.
Flowing Wells Unified School District, At-large
General election
General election for Flowing Wells Unified School District, At-large (3 seats)
Incumbent Stephanie Miller, incumbent Wendy Effing, and incumbent Kevin Daily defeated Joseph Delgado in the general election for Flowing Wells Unified School District, At-large on November 5, 2024.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ |  | Stephanie Miller (Nonpartisan) | 29.4 | 5,725 |
| ✔ | Wendy Effing (Nonpartisan) | 25.4 | 4,939 | |
| ✔ |  | Kevin Daily (Nonpartisan) | 23.3 | 4,543 |
| Joseph Delgado (Nonpartisan) | 21.0 | 4,086 | ||
| Other/Write-in votes | 0.8 | 165 | ||
| Total votes: 19,458 | |||
 = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
- Matthew Capalby (Nonpartisan)
Flowing Wells Unified School District, At-large
General election
General election for Flowing Wells Unified School District, At-large (2 seats)
Incumbent Kristine Hammar and Brianna Hamilton defeated incumbent Kevin Daily in the general election for Flowing Wells Unified School District, At-large on November 8, 2022.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ | Kristine Hammar (Nonpartisan) | 35.7 | 3,728 | |
| ✔ | Brianna Hamilton (Nonpartisan) | 31.9 | 3,335 | |
| Kevin Daily (Nonpartisan) | 31.4 | 3,280 | |
| Other/Write-in votes | 0.9 | 99 | ||
| Total votes: 10,442 | |||
| = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Flowing Wells Unified School District, At-large
General election
The general election was canceled. Wendy Effing (Nonpartisan), Tom Jacobs (Nonpartisan), and Jim Love (Nonpartisan) won without appearing on the ballot.
Flowing Wells Unified School District, At-large
General election
The general election was canceled. Kevin Daily (Nonpartisan) and Kristine Hammar (Nonpartisan) won without appearing on the ballot.
Election rules
Election dates and frequency
School board general elections in Arizona are held on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November every two years in even-numbered years.
See law: Arizona Statute Section 15-424 & 16-211
Election system
School board members in Arizona are elected through nonpartisan general elections without primaries.
See law: Arizona Statute Section 16-211
Party labels on the ballot
School board elections in Arizona are nonpartisan, which means party labels do not appear on the ballot for school board candidates.
See law:
Arizona Statutes Section 15-422 and Section 16-502
Winning an election
School board candidates that receive the largest number of votes in the general election are elected to office.
See law: Arizona Statute Section 15-424
Term length and staggering
School board members in Arizona have four-year terms. Certain school board members have initial two-year terms when a new district is formed or when a district is changing the number of board members in order to establish a staggered election schedule.
See law: Arizona Statute Section 15-424
As close to half of school board members as possible are elected every two years. Upon the formation of a new district, all board members are elected at one election and the initial terms of the two winning candidates receiving lower numbers of votes are shortened to two years to achieve staggering.
See law: Arizona Statue Section 15-424
Representation: at large vs. by sub-district
School board members are elected at large.
See law: Arizona Statute Section 15-427 & 15-429
Filing deadlines and swearing-in dates
The school board candidate filing deadline in Arizona is 120 days before the election date.
See law: Arizona Statue Section 16-311
School board candidates can circulate their nomination petitions starting when the filling window opens 150 days before the election, which is 30 days before the filing deadline.
See law: Arizona Statue Section 16-311
Newly elected school board members officially take office at the first organizational meeting of the school board, which must be held between the first and 15th day of January following the general election.
See law: Arizona Statute Section 15-321
About the district
School board
The Flowing Wells Unified School District consists of five members serving four-year terms. To find information about school board meetings, click here.
| Name | Year assumed office | Year term ends |
|---|---|---|
| Wendy Effing | 2029 | |
| Stephanie Miller | 2024 | 2029 |
| Kevin Daily | 2023 | 2029 |
| Arlene Ochoa | 2025 | 2027 |
| Brianna Hamilton | 2023 | 2027 |
Join the conversation about school board politics
Unlock the full dataset for your own use cases — explore subscription options to our comprehensive list of all school board members in the country.
District map
Overlapping state house districts
The table was limited to the lower chamber because it provides the most granularity. State house districts tend to be more numerous and therefore smaller than state senate or U.S. House districts. This provides an impression of the partisan affiliations in the area.
Budget
The following statistics were published by the National Center for Education Statistics, which is a part of the U.S. Department of Education.[1]
| SOURCE | AMOUNT | AMOUNT PER STUDENT | PERCENT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Federal: | $13,783,000 | $2,586 | 22% |
| Local: | $20,138,000 | $3,779 | 32% |
| State: | $29,778,000 | $5,588 | 47% |
| Total: | $63,699,000 | $11,953 |
| TYPE | AMOUNT | AMOUNT PER STUDENT | PERCENT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Expenditures: | $60,483,000 | $11,097 | |
| Total Current Expenditures: | $50,648,000 | $9,293 | |
| Instructional Expenditures: | $28,499,000 | $5,229 | 47% |
| Student and Staff Support: | $6,859,000 | $1,258 | 11% |
| Administration: | $4,887,000 | $896 | 8% |
| Operations, Food Service, Other: | $10,403,000 | $1,908 | 17% |
| Total Capital Outlay: | $7,534,000 | $1,382 | |
| Construction: | $4,867,000 | $893 | |
| Total Non El-Sec Education & Other: | $444,000 | $81 | |
| Interest on Debt: | $1,318,000 | $241 |
Academic performance
Each year, state and local education agencies use tests and other standards to assess student proficiency. Although the data below was published by the U.S. Department of Education, proficiency measurements are established by the states. As a result, proficiency levels are not comparable between different states and year-over-year proficiency levels within a district may not be comparable because states may change their proficiency measurements. To protect student privacy, percentages are reported as ranges for groups of 300 students or fewer. If five or fewer students were included in a data set, the data will display as "PS."[2]
The following table shows the percentage of district students who scored at or above the proficiency level each school year:
| School year | All (%) | Asian/Pacific Islander (%) | Black (%) | Hispanic (%) | Native American (%) | Two or More Races (%) | White (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-2021 | 23 | 30-39 | 20-29 | 19 | <=20 | <=20 | 34 |
| 2018-2019 | 42 | 40-59 | 30-39 | 39 | 21-39 | 40-49 | 52 |
| 2017-2018 | 39 | 60-69 | 30-39 | 36 | 40-59 | 50-59 | 46 |
| 2016-2017 | 41 | 40-49 | 40-49 | 36 | 50-59 | 48 | |
| 2015-2016 | 34 | 60-69 | 20-29 | 31 | 40-49 | 36 | |
| 2014-2015 | 32 | 50-59 | 30-34 | 27 | 30-39 | 41 | |
| 2013-2014 | 63 | 80-89 | 50-54 | 59 | 60-69 | 69 | |
| 2012-2013 | 60 | 80-89 | 55-59 | 56 | 60-69 | 66 | |
| 2011-2012 | 63 | 80-89 | 65-69 | 59 | 50-59 | 68 | |
| 2010-2011 | 65 | 70-79 | 55-59 | 62 | 60-64 | 71 |
The following table shows the percentage of district students who scored at or above the proficiency level each school year:
| School year | All (%) | Asian/Pacific Islander (%) | Black (%) | Hispanic (%) | Native American (%) | Two or More Races (%) | White (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-2021 | 30 | 30-39 | 30-39 | 27 | 11-19 | 21-39 | 38 |
| 2018-2019 | 44 | 40-59 | 40-49 | 41 | 21-39 | 30-39 | 52 |
| 2017-2018 | 43 | 70-79 | 30-39 | 39 | 40-59 | 50-59 | 49 |
| 2016-2017 | 38 | 40-49 | 30-39 | 34 | 40-49 | 45 | |
| 2015-2016 | 39 | 50-59 | 30-39 | 35 | 30-39 | 43 | |
| 2014-2015 | 34 | 50-59 | 35-39 | 30 | 30-39 | 42 | |
| 2013-2014 | 80 | 80-89 | 75-79 | 78 | 70-79 | 84 | |
| 2012-2013 | 78 | >=90 | 80-84 | 75 | 70-79 | 82 | |
| 2011-2012 | 78 | >=90 | 75-79 | 75 | 70-79 | 81 | |
| 2010-2011 | 78 | 80-89 | 75-79 | 74 | 75-79 | 83 |
The following table shows the graduation rate of district students each school year:
| School year | All (%) | Asian/Pacific Islander (%) | Black (%) | Hispanic (%) | Native American (%) | Two or More Races (%) | White (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-2020 | 82 | PS | >=50 | 80-84 | >=50 | PS | 75-79 |
| 2018-2019 | 83 | >=50 | >=50 | 80 | >=50 | 85-89 | |
| 2017-2018 | 89 | >=50 | >=50 | 90-94 | PS | PS | 85-89 |
| 2016-2017 | 87 | >=50 | >=50 | 70-74 | >=50 | 90-94 | |
| 2015-2016 | 91 | PS | >=50 | 90-94 | >=50 | 90-94 | |
| 2014-2015 | 86 | >=50 | >=50 | 85-89 | >=50 | 85-89 | |
| 2013-2014 | 83 | >=50 | >=50 | 80-84 | >=50 | 80-84 | |
| 2012-2013 | 82 | >=50 | >=50 | 75-79 | >=50 | 85-89 | |
| 2011-2012 | 86 | PS | >=50 | 85-89 | >=50 | 80-84 | |
| 2010-2011 | 89 | >=80 | >=50 | 90-94 | >=50 | 85-89 |
Students
The following statistics were published by the National Center for Education Statistics, which is a part of the U.S. Department of Education.[3]
| Year | Enrollment | Year-to-year change (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 2023-2024 | 5,287 | -2.3 |
| 2022-2023 | 5,408 | -0.8 |
| 2021-2022 | 5,450 | 0.8 |
| 2020-2021 | 5,409 | -4.5 |
| 2019-2020 | 5,655 | 0.1 |
| 2018-2019 | 5,650 | 3.9 |
| 2017-2018 | 5,427 | -0.2 |
| 2016-2017 | 5,438 | 3.4 |
| 2015-2016 | 5,253 | -5.3 |
| 2014-2015 | 5,534 | 0.9 |
| 2013-2014 | 5,482 | -0.2 |
| 2012-2013 | 5,494 | 2.6 |
| 2011-2012 | 5,352 | -0.8 |
| 2010-2011 | 5,394 | -1.2 |
| 2009-2010 | 5,459 | -0.9 |
| 2008-2009 | 5,508 | -6.7 |
| 2007-2008 | 5,877 | -2.7 |
| 2006-2007 | 6,038 | -1.0 |
| 2005-2006 | 6,099 | 2.4 |
| 2004-2005 | 5,954 | -1.5 |
| 2003-2004 | 6,041 | -0.8 |
| 2002-2003 | 6,089 | 1.4 |
| 2001-2002 | 6,006 | -0.2 |
| 2000-2001 | 6,018 | -2.6 |
| 1999-2000 | 6,172 | 0.0 |
| RACE | Flowing Wells Unified School District (%) | Arizona K-12 STUDENTS (%) |
|---|---|---|
| American Indian/Alaska Native | 1.1 | 4.2 |
| Asian or Asian/Pacific Islander | 0.9 | 3.2 |
| Black | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Hispanic | 71.7 | 48.2 |
| Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander | 0.3 | 0.4 |
| Two or More Races | 1.7 | 4.3 |
| White | 22.4 | 33.9 |
Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here.
Staff
The following statistics were published by the National Center for Education Statistics, which is a part of the U.S. Department of Education.[4]
As of the 2023-2024 school year, Flowing Wells Unified School District had 305.80 full-time classroom teachers. The student-teacher ratio was 17.29.
| TYPE | NUMBER OF TEACHERS |
|---|---|
| Prekindergarten: | 0.00 |
| Kindergarten: | 18.00 |
| Elementary: | 161.48 |
| Secondary: | 126.32 |
| Total: | 305.80 |
Flowing Wells Unified School District employed 7.25 district administrators and 17.00 school administrators as of the 2023-2024 school year.
| TYPE | NUMBER OF ADMINISTRATORS |
|---|---|
| District Administrators: | 7.25 |
| District Administrative Support: | 21.01 |
| School Administrators: | 17.00 |
| School Administrative Support: | 21.50 |
| TYPE | NUMBER OF OTHER STAFF |
|---|---|
| Instructional Aides: | 126.82 |
| Instruc. Coordinators & Supervisors: | 6.00 |
| Total Guidance Counselors: | 9.00 |
| Elementary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 |
| Secondary Guidance Counselors: | 9.00 |
| Librarians/Media Specialists: | 3.00 |
| Library/Media Support: | 5.27 |
| Student Support Services: | 78.52 |
| Other Support Services: | 89.43 |
Schools
The following statistics were published by the National Center for Education Statistics, which is a part of the U.S. Department of Education.[5]
About school boards
Education legislation in Arizona
Bills are monitored by BillTrack50 and sorted by action history.
See also
| School Boards | Education Policy | Local Politics | Arizona |
|---|---|---|---|
 |
 |
 |
 |
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ National Center for Education Statistics, "Elementary/Secondary Information System," accessed October 6, 2025
- ↑ U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC: EDFacts, "State Assessments in Reading/Language Arts and Mathematics- School Year 2018-19 EDFacts Data Documentation," accessed February 25, 2021
- ↑ National Center for Education Statistics, "Elementary/Secondary Information System," accessed October 6, 2025
- ↑ National Center for Education Statistics, "Elementary/Secondary Information System," accessed October 6, 2025
- ↑ National Center for Education Statistics, "Elementary/Secondary Information System," accessed October 6, 2025
| |||||
