Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.

Frami v. Ponto

From Ballotpedia
(Redirected from Frami v Ponto)
Jump to: navigation, search

Laws governing ballot measures

BallotLaw final.png

State
Laws governing state initiative processes
Laws governing state recall processes
Changes to ballot measure law in 2025
Difficulty analysis of changes to laws governing ballot measures
Analysis of 2025 changes to laws governing ballot measures
Local
Laws governing local ballot measures

Learn about Ballotpedia's election legislation tracker.

2026 »
« 2024

Frami v. Ponto was decided in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin in 2003. In this case, district court judge Barbara Crabb ruled that a Wisconsin statute requiring that petition circulators be residents of Wisconsin, as well as residents of the political subdivision in which they were circulating petitions, was an unconstitutional abridgement of the first amendment rights of petition circulators and candidates for elective office.

Crabb enjoined defendant Steven Ponto, the chairman of the Wisconsin State Elections Board from enforcing the statute mandating residency requirements for petition circulators.

See also

External links