Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Fundraising in North Carolina state legislative elections, 2020

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Comparing campaign finance data in state elections, 2018-2020

Arizona
Florida
Michigan
Minnesota
North Carolina
Ohio
Pennsylvania
Wisconsin
Texas

Transparency USA partnershipFederal campaign finance laws and regulations
Portal:Elections

September 29, 2020

The value of money in North Carolina politics extends beyond purchasing power. Campaign cash allows candidates to promote their message and turn out their voters, but perhaps more importantly, it often represents momentum. While having the biggest campaign account is no guarantee of success at the polls, studies conducted by the Center for Responsive Politics and the Campaign Finance Institute found a strong correlation.[1][2]

As part of our ongoing partnership with Transparency USA, we took a closer look at how the two major political party candidates for the General Assembly of North Carolina have been doing with fundraising in a cycle-vs-cycle comparison from 2018 to 2020. Here’s what we found:

  • The overall contributions favor the Republicans, both in the aggregate and per candidate. As of the semiannual reports, Republican candidates for the General Assembly of North Carolina had raised $13.6 million, while Democrats had raised $12.4 million. Similarly, Republicans had raised on average $68,376, while Democrats had raised on average $59,545.
  • The percentage of change between 2018 and 2020 favors the Democrats in several metrics we studied. The number of individual donations to Democrats is up 64 percent, while the number of donations to Republican candidates is down 28 percent. Democrats have also seen a 92 percent increase in the number of small-dollar donations (less than or equal to $100) while these donations have declined for Republicans since 2018 by 23 percent.

In North Carolina, 77 contested state legislative primaries took place in 2018, and 16 of them (21%) were decided by a margin of 10% or less. In 2020, 60 contested state legislative primaries took place, and 7 of them (12%) were decided by a margin of 10% or less."

Democrats vs. Republicans, by the numbers

Candidate donations

The numbers from the table below were taken from campaign finance reports for North Carolina State Senate and North Carolina House of Representatives candidates from January 1, 2019, to June 30, 2020, and those were compared with reports from the same time period during the 2018 election cycle.

Donations to General Assembly of North Carolina candidates, 2018 and 2020
General Assembly of North Carolina candidate donations 2018 Cycle
(1/1/2017 - 6/30/2018)
2020 Cycle
(1/1/2019 - 6/30/2020)
Percentage (%) change
Number of Candidates - Democrat 226 208 -8%
Number of Candidates - Republican 219 199 -9%
Total Donations - Democrat $15,345,968 $12,385,400 -19%
Total Donations - Republican $18,407,147 $13,606,738 -26%
Number of Donations - Democrat 41,133 67,339 +64%
Number of Donations - Republican 20,042 14,435 -28%
Average Raised by Candidates - Democrat $67,903 $59,545 -12%
Average Raised by Candidates - Republican $84,051 $68,376 -19%
Average Donation Amount - Democrat $373 $184 -51%
Average Donation Amount - Republican $918 $943 +3%

Party donations

In North Carolina, party donations for the 2020 election cycle so far favor the Democrats, although both parties have experienced a decline in contributions compared to 2018.

Donations to state party PACs, 2018 and 2020
State party PACs 2018 Cycle
(1/1/2017 - 6/30/2018)
2020 Cycle
(1/1/2019 - 6/30/2020)
Percentage (%) change
North Carolina Democratic Party $7,518,535 $2,809,182 -63%
North Carolina Republican Party $3,975,654 $1,846,876 -54%

How do we get these numbers?

Transparency USA matches the lists of candidates who filed to run for North Carolina House of Representatives or North Carolina State Senate in the last two election cycles with records of campaign accounts and affiliated political action committees (PACs). In cases with more, the numbers are combined to get a complete picture of the money raised.

After linking all campaign accounts to a candidate name, Transparency USA "cleans" the data; in other words, they remove duplicate and sometimes triplicate entries. Often, a candidate’s donation is reported multiple times because of overlapping or confusing filing deadlines with the state agency. Sometimes there are misspelled names, like a John Doe, John Dough, and John and Mary Dow, all at the same address. Other times, they link together nicknames such as Tim Brown and Timothy Brown at the same address. They also link unclear PAC names, like "Pete for Senate," to the correct candidate (i.e. "Pete Smith").

While we have totaled the contributions to candidates to give you the big picture, you can see all the individual contributions by searching the candidate’s name below.

One more note: Candidates must provide detailed information (the donor’s name, address, occupation, employer, and date of contribution) when the donor gives the candidate more than $50 in the election cycle. While our totals capture all the donations to candidates whether large or small, we do not have detailed donor information for those who contribute less than $50.

Charts

State senate

See also: North Carolina State Senate elections, 2020

Fundraising advantages

Overall fundraising

Fundraising comparison

State house

See also: North Carolina House of Representatives elections, 2020

Fundraising advantages

Overall fundraising


Fundraising comparison

Full data set

The story isn’t over

In 2018, 54.39 percent of the total giving came in during the last months before the election. If the trend holds true, we should see another $31 million flow into North Carolina campaign coffers before election day. Check back to see how your favorite candidates are stacking up in the final days before the election.

Limitations

The direct comparison between fundraising data from 2018 and 2020 is limited by at least two factors. First, the same seats and offices were not necessarily up for election in both years. For example, Michigan held elections for both chambers (the state Senate and House of Representatives) in 2018, but only for the House in 2020. Second, additional offices on the ballot in a year might affect the amount of money raised in state legislative elections. For example, among the states studied, Florida, Minnesota, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Wisconsin all held gubernatorial elections alongside their state legislative elections in 2018 but not 2020.

See also

External links

Footnotes