Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF THE SOUTHWEST v. FALCON (1982)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF THE SOUTHWEST v. FALCON
Term: 1981
Important Dates
Argued: April 26, 1982
Decided: June 14, 1982
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
8-1
Majority
Harry BlackmunWilliam BrennanThurgood MarshallSandra Day O'ConnorLewis PowellWilliam RehnquistJohn Paul StevensByron White
Dissenting
Warren Burger

GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF THE SOUTHWEST v. FALCON is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 14, 1982. The case was argued before the court on April 26, 1982.

In an 8-1 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Texas Northern U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1980s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Burger Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Judicial Power - Federal Rules of Civil Procedure including Supreme Court Rules, application of the Federal Rules of Evidence, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure in civil litigation, Circuit Court Rules, and state rules and admiralty rules
  • Petitioner: employer. If employer's relations with employees are governed by the nature of the employer's business (e.g., railroad, boat), rather than labor law generally, the more specific designation is used in place of Employer.
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Racial or ethnic minority
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 457 U.S. 147
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Warren Burger
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: John Paul Stevens

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes