Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO., INC. et al. v. RAY-O-VAC COMPANY (1944)

| GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO., INC. et al. v. RAY-O-VAC COMPANY |
|---|
| Term: 1943 |
| Important Dates |
| Argued: February 2, 1944 |
| Decided: February 28, 1944 |
| Outcome |
| Affirmed (includes modified) |
| Vote |
| 5-4 |
| Majority |
| Felix Frankfurter • Stanley Reed • Owen Josephus Roberts • Wiley Rutledge • Harlan Fiske Stone |
| Dissenting |
| Hugo Black • William Douglas • Robert Jackson • Frank Murphy |
GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO., INC. et al. v. RAY-O-VAC COMPANY is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 28, 1944. The case was argued before the court on February 2, 1944.
In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Illinois Eastern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1940s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Stone Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - Patents and copyrights: patent
- Petitioner: Defendant
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Inventor, patent assigner, trademark owner or holder
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 321 U.S. 275
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Harlan Fiske Stone
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Owen Josephus Roberts
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes